Useful Products in Theorizing for Information Systems

Recent years have seen a growing interest in theory building within the information systems (IS) field and debate is continuing on what constitutes theories in IS. This study extends Weick's recommendation to focus instead on theorizing rather than on the theories themselves as a way of progressing forward. It focuses on the products of theorizing that only approximate theories but are critical to their development including discursive formations, questions, analogies, myths, metaphors, paradigms, concepts, constructs, statements, propositions, models and frameworks. These terms can be found scattered in various treatise on theories but are not sufficiently elaborated in a cohesive manner as products of theorizing. This study defines these terms, describes their characteristics and how they enhance theorizing.

[1]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  Studying Organizational Cultures Through Rites and Ceremonials , 1984 .

[2]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  Where is the Cloud? Geography, Economics, Environment, and Jurisdiction in Cloud Computing , 2009, First Monday.

[3]  R. Mason,et al.  Metaphors and strategic information systems planning , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  T. Cook,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research , 1981 .

[5]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Nik Rushdi Hassan,et al.  Are We Using the Right "Paradigms?" Comparing Metaphysical, Sociological and Conceptual Paradigms , 2013, AMCIS.

[8]  Edward Walker,et al.  The Real Cost of a CPU Hour , 2009, Computer.

[9]  G. Thomson,et al.  The Inspiration of Science , 1961, Nature.

[10]  R. Brown.  Social theory as metaphor On the logic of discovery for the sciences of conduct , 1976 .

[11]  Frédéric Adam,et al.  The status of the IS field: historical perspective and practical orientation , 2000, Information Research.

[12]  Jonny Holmström.  Theorizing in IS Research: What Came Before and What Comes Next? , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  P. Reynolds.  A Primer in Theory Construction , 1971 .

[14]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[15]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing , 2011 .

[17]  D. Bidney.  Myth, Symbolism, and Truth , 1955 .

[18]  Ron Weber,et al.  Reach and Grasp in the Debate over the IS Core: An Empty Hand? , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Deepak Khazanchi,et al.  On the rhetoric and relevance of IS research paradigms: a conceptual framework and some propositions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[20]  Nik R Hassan,et al.  Is information systems a discipline? Foucauldian and Toulminian insights , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Sung Yul Ryoo,et al.  An empirical investigation of end-users' switching toward cloud computing: A two factor theory perspective , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[23]  Paul Gray,et al.  Introduction to the Debate on the Core of the Information Systems Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Mieke Bal,et al.  Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide , 2002 .

[25]  M. Foucault,et al.  The archaeology of knowledge ; and, The discourse on language , 1972 .

[26]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Reach and Grasp , 2004, MIS Q..

[27]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Mary Tate,et al.  A Descriptive Literature Review and Classification of Cloud Computing Research , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Abhijit Gopal,et al.  Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction , 2000, MIS Q..

[30]  P. Ein-Dor,et al.  A paradigm for management information systems , 1981 .

[31]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[32]  G. Ritzer.  Sociology : A Multiple Paradigm Science , 1975 .

[33]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  On the Logic of the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  R. Harré.  The Principles Of Scientific Thinking , 1970 .

[37]  Shih-Wei Chou,et al.  Understanding the formation of software-as-a-service (SaaS) satisfaction from the perspective of service quality , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Percy S. Cohen,et al.  Theories of Myth , 1969 .

[39]  Mark Keil,et al.  Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[41]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[42]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[43]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Chinyao Low,et al.  Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[45]  Lee Revens.  The First Twenty-Five Years , 1972, CACM.

[46]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[49]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[50]  John Mingers,et al.  Paradigm wars: ceasefire announced who will set up the new administration? , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[51]  James Mahoney,et al.  Concepts and measurement: Ontology and epistemology , 2012 .

[52]  Nik Hassan,et al.  Synthesizing Diversity and Pluralism in Information Systems: Forging a Unique Disciplinary Subject Matter for the Information Systems Field , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Andrew Delano Abbott,et al.  Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences , 2004 .

[54]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Beyond Metaphysics and Theory Consumerism: A comment to Rose, Jones, and Truex "Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency" , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[57]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges , 2010, Journal of Internet Services and Applications.

[58]  David E. Avison,et al.  Is theory king?: questioning the theory fetish in information systems , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[59]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[60]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[61]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[62]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Article in Press Future Generation Computer Systems ( ) – Future Generation Computer Systems Cloud Computing and Emerging It Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing as the 5th Utility , 2022 .

[63]  R. Suddaby.  Editor's Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization , 2010 .

[64]  J. T. Kirby.  Aristotle On Metaphor , 1997 .

[65]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[67]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Multi‐metaphor method: organizational metaphors in information systems development , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[68]  Paul Hofmann,et al.  Cloud computing and electricity , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[69]  Nigel P. Melville,et al.  Theories Used in Information Systems Research: Identifying Theory Networks in Leading IS Journals , 2009, ICIS.

[70]  Daniel Robey,et al.  More on myth, magic and metaphor: Cultural insights into the management of information technology in organizations , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[71]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[72]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Sylvain Bromberger,et al.  On What We Know We Don't Know: Explanation, Theory, Linguistics, and How Questions Shape Them , 1993 .

[74]  G. Sartori,et al.  Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis , 1984 .

[75]  Aristotle,et al.  The Basic Works of Aristotle , 1941 .

[76]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Service Quality in Software-as-a-Service: Developing the SaaS-Qual Measure and Examining Its Role in Usage Continuance , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[77]  A. Kaplan.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science , 1965 .

[78]  Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Cloud computing - The business perspective , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[79]  Ronald K. Stamper,et al.  Information Systems as a Social Science: An Alternative to the FRISCO Formalism , 2000, ISCO.

[80]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[81]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[82]  K. Maccorquodale,et al.  On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. , 1948, Psychological review.

[83]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Preparing for the Future: Understanding the Seven Capabilities of Cloud Computing , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[84]  Norman Robert Campbell,et al.  Physics: The Elements , 2007 .

[85]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[86]  W. Dilthey,et al.  Introduction to the human sciences , 1989 .

[87]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[88]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[89]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[90]  Bruce Robinson,et al.  The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991–2001 , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[91]  Beniamino Di Martino,et al.  Cloud Computing: Security, Privacy and Practice , 2015, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[92]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[93]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  In Search of Paradigms: Identifying the Theoretical Foundations of the IS Field , 2010, ECIS.

[94]  Sandy Behrens,et al.  Information Systems Diversity: Metaphor, Meaning and Myth , 2007, ICIS.

[95]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The essential tension : selected studies in scientific tradition and change , 1977 .

[96]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[97]  A. Stinchcombe.  Constructing Social Theories , 1970 .

[98]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[99]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Cloud Computing in Developing Economies , 2010, Computer.

[100]  Christopher J. Atkinson,et al.  The Nature and Role of Generative Systemic Metaphor within Information Systems Planning and Development , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[101]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan , 2000 .

[102]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[103]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Critical review – Outsourcing: a paradigm shift , 2000 .

[104]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[105]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[106]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[107]  Julie E. Kendall,et al.  Metaphors and Methodologies: Living Beyond the Systems Machine , 1993, MIS Q..

[108]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis Contrasting Information Systems Development Approaches and Methodologies , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[109]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[110]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[111]  M. Meyer.  Of Problematology: Philosophy, Science, and Language , 1995 .

[112]  Donna B. Stoddard,et al.  Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions? , 1994, MIS Q..

[113]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[114]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[115]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Chaos of disciplines , 2001 .