Preventable Complications Driving Rising Costs in Management of Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify factors that drive increasing health-care costs associated with the management of critical limb ischemia in elective inpatients. METHODS Patients with a primary diagnosis code of critical limb ischemia (CLI) were identified from the 2001-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Demographics, CLI management, comorbidities, complications (bleeding, surgical site infection [SSI]), length of stay, and median in-hospital costs were reviewed. Statistical analysis was completed using Students' t-test and Mann-Kendall trend analysis. Costs are reported in 2011 US dollars corrected using the consumer price index. RESULTS From 2001 to 2011, there were a total of 451,823 patients who underwent open elective revascularization as inpatients for CLI. Costs to treat CLI increased by 63% ($12,560 in 2001 to $20,517 in 2011, P < 0.001 in trend analysis). Endovascular interventions were 20% more expensive compared with open surgery ($19,566 vs. $16,337, P < 0.001). Age, gender, and insurance status did not affect the cost of care. From 2001 to 2011, the number of patient comorbidities (7.56-12.40) and percentage of endovascular cases (13.4% to 27.4%) increased, accounting for a 6% annual increase in total cost despite decreased median length of stay (6 to 5 days). Patients who developed SSI had total costs 83% greater than patients without SSIs ($30,949 vs. $16,939; P < 0.001). Patients who developed bleeding complications had total costs 41% greater than nonbleeding patients ($23,779 vs. $16,821, P < 0.001). Overall, there was a 32% reduction in SSI rates but unchanged rates of bleeding complications during this period. CONCLUSIONS The cost of CLI treatment is increasing and driven by rising endovascular use, SSI, and bleeding in the in-patient population. Further efforts to reduce complications in this patient population may contribute to a reduction in health care-associated costs of treating CLI.

[1]  M. Schermerhorn,et al.  Body mass index: surgical site infections and mortality after lower extremity bypass from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2007. , 2010, Annals of vascular surgery.

[2]  Joshua T. Cohen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness in the contemporary management of critical limb ischemia with tissue loss. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  L. Graziani Comprehensive Approach to Management of Critical Limb Ischemia , 2014, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[4]  N. Barshes,et al.  A framework for the evaluation of "value" and cost-effectiveness in the management of critical limb ischemia. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  P. Rossi,et al.  Surgical site infections after lower extremity revascularization procedures involving groin incisions. , 2014, Annals of vascular surgery.

[6]  P. Wallner,et al.  The impact of technology on health care cost and policy development. , 2008, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[7]  M. Schermerhorn,et al.  Trends in the national outcomes and costs for claudication and limb threatening ischemia: angioplasty vs bypass graft. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  H. Welch,et al.  National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  B. Perler,et al.  Cost-efficacy issues in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease: primary amputation or revascularization for limb-threatening ischemia. , 1995, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.