Light rail transit cost performance: opportunities for future-proofing

The cost performance of Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems have been scrutinized by the popular press and public sector infrastructure agencies as they have been prone to incurring cost increases in their capital expenditures (CAPEX). In tackling such increases, emphasis is placed on mitigating strategic misrepresentation and optimism bias, which has hindered the public sectors ability to embrace innovation, particularly with regard to the justification and adoption of LRT. More often than not, operational expenditure (OPEX) is neglected, and is not considered a part of the transportation cost performance literature. The aim of this paper is to examine the equivocality that surrounds the determination of cost performance of LRT projects. It is suggested that the public sector should move beyond focusing on strategic misrepresentation and optimism bias, as many governments worldwide now have in place mechanisms to address such issues, and instead focus on future-proofing their assets. It is suggested that the key enablers of future-proofing LRT are (1) private finance; (2) delivery strategy (e.g. design-build-finance-operate); (3) digitization (e.g. building information modelling); and (4) asset management (e.g. smart technologies). If the public sector is to provide an LRT system that is cost effective and able to respond to the demands imposed by climate change, then it needs to be considered from a life-cycle perspective and funding sought from the private sector to ensure its viability.

[1]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Light Rail and BRT: Competitive or Complementary? , 2005 .

[2]  R. Westrum Cultures with Requisite Imagination , 1993 .

[3]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[4]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Identifying resident preferences for bus-based and rail-based investments as a complementary buy in perspective to inform project planning prioritisation , 2015 .

[5]  Li Liu,et al.  Improving Cost Estimates of Construction Projects Using Phased Cost Factors , 2007 .

[6]  Dan Lovallo,et al.  Delusion and Deception in Large Infrastructure Projects: Two Models for Explaining and Preventing Executive Disaster , 2009, 1303.7403.

[7]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Cost overruns in transportation infrastructure projects: Sowing the seeds for a probabilistic theory of causation , 2016 .

[8]  Gro Holst Volden,et al.  Governance schemes for major public investment projects: A comparative study of principles and practices in six countries. , 2016 .

[9]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Modal image: candidate drivers of preference differences for BRT and LRT , 2015 .

[10]  David Bryde,et al.  The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .

[11]  Procedures for Dealing with Optimism Bias in Transport Planning , 2004 .

[12]  T. Sharot The optimism bias , 2011, Current Biology.

[13]  Robert John Lark,et al.  BIM for infrastructure: An overall review and constructor perspective , 2016 .

[14]  Li Liu,et al.  The accuracy of risk‐based cost estimation for water infrastructure projects: preliminary evidence from Australian projects , 2010 .

[15]  Albert O. Hirschman Development Projects Observed , 1967 .

[16]  M. Regan Capital Markets, Infrastructure Investment and Growth in the Asia Pacific Region , 2017 .

[17]  William Vincent,et al.  The Potential for Bus Rapid Transit to Reduce Transportation-Related CO2 Emissions , 2006 .

[18]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Understanding the Landscape of Overruns in Transport Infrastructure Projects , 2015 .

[19]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Impact of the Capital Market Collapse on Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects , 2011 .

[20]  O. Williamson Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[21]  Jane Matthews,et al.  Systems information modelling: Enabling digital asset management , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[22]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus , 2002 .

[23]  James Odeck,et al.  Cost escalations in the front-end of projects – empirical evidence from Norwegian road projects , 2017 .

[24]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Is rail cleaner and greener than bus , 2017 .

[25]  B. Flyvbjerg What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview , 2014, 1409.0003.

[26]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[27]  B. Flyvbjerg The Fallacy of Beneficial Ignorance: A Test of Hirschman's Hiding Hand , 2016 .

[28]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Why do the design stage elemental cost plan and final tender sum differ in New Zealand , 2015 .

[29]  Li Liu,et al.  The Accuracy of Hybrid Estimating Approaches: A Case Study of an Australian State Road & Traffic Authority , 2010 .

[30]  Michael Regan,et al.  Infrastructure Procurement: Learning from Private–Public Partnership Experiences ‘Down Under’ , 2011 .

[31]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Cost Overruns and Demand Shortfalls in Urban Rail and Other Infrastructure , 2007, 1303.7402.

[32]  D. Hensher Why is Light Rail Starting to Dominate Bus Rapid Transit Yet Again? , 2016 .

[33]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Future Proofing PPPs: Life-Cycle Performance Measurement and Building Information Modelling , 2015 .