A Framework for Research on Large-scale Reform

Variation in the success of large-scale reform is afunction of many factors interacting at many ``levels''.Built on a selective review of the evidence aboutlarge-scale reform, this paper provides a framework forexplaining such variation, as well as assessing progressin that direction. Relevant factors influencing reformsuccess, according to the framework, include broad international social, economic and political trends bearing on education, characteristics of national educationalpolicies and strategies for their implementation, and localconditions conceptualized in terms of a model of workplaceproductivity; this model is defined by local practitioners' motivation, capacity, and the organizationalconditions in which they work. This framework has been usedto guide the external evaluation of the National Literacy andNumeracy Strategies.

[1]  Ian Westbury A Nation at Risk , 1984 .

[2]  K. Leithwood,et al.  School Leadership and Teachers’ Motivation to Implement Accountability Policies , 2002 .

[3]  G. Hess,et al.  Expectations, Opportunity, Capacity, and Will: The Four Essential Components of Chicago School Reform , 1999 .

[4]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Accountability and School Performance: Implications from Restructuring Schools , 1996 .

[5]  P. Mortimore,et al.  School Matters: The Junior Years , 1995 .

[6]  John E. Laird,et al.  Symbolic architectures for cognition , 1989 .

[7]  A. Bandura Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. , 1990, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[8]  H. Lauder,et al.  Trading in Futures: Why Markets in Education Don't Work , 1999 .

[9]  Susan H. Fuhrman,et al.  Issues and Strategies in Systemic Reform. , 1992 .

[10]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[11]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[12]  K. Leithwood,et al.  An Organisational Learning Perspective on School Responses to Central Policy Initiatives , 1995 .

[13]  Amanda Datnow,et al.  Teachers' Responses to Success for All: How Beliefs, Experiences, and Adaptations Shape Implementation , 2000 .

[14]  A. Bandura Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[15]  Peter Sleegers,et al.  Management of innovations from a cultural-individual perspective , 1999 .

[16]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  The architecture of mind: a connectionist approach , 1989 .

[17]  David Reynolds,et al.  Worlds apart? : a review of international surveys of educational achievement involving England , 1996 .

[18]  S. Lusi The Role of State Departments of Education in Complex School Reform. The Series on School Reform. , 1997 .

[19]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Organizational learning in schools , 1999 .

[20]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[21]  H. Heneman Assessment of the Motivational Reactions of Teachers to a School-Based Performance Award Program , 1998 .

[22]  M. Ford Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs , 1992 .

[23]  Marshall S. Smith,et al.  Systemic school reform , 1990 .

[24]  R. Elmore Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[25]  R. Goddard,et al.  Collective efficacy : A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement , 2001 .

[26]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes , 1996 .

[27]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[28]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Charting Chicago School Reform: Democratic Localism As A Lever For Change , 1998 .

[29]  Michael Huberman,et al.  Teacher careers and school improvement , 1988 .

[30]  Michael Rutter,et al.  Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children , 1979 .

[31]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Congruence and friction between learning and teaching , 1999 .

[32]  C. Wylie Ten Years On: How Schools View Educational Reform. , 1999 .

[33]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[34]  K. Leithwood,et al.  Educational Accountability Effects: An International Perspective , 2000 .

[35]  John I. Goodlad,et al.  The Schools We Deserve@@@A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future , 1987 .

[36]  Hilda Borko,et al.  “That Dog Won't Hunt!”: Exemplary School Change Efforts Within the Kentucky Reform , 2000 .

[37]  Rodney T. Ogawa,et al.  Understanding Schools as Intelligent Systems , 2000 .

[38]  Susan Johnson Incentives for Teachers: What Motivates, what Matters , 1986 .

[39]  T. Guskey,et al.  Despite the Best Intentions: Inconsistencies Among Components in Kentucky's Systemic Reform , 1997 .

[40]  C. Kelley,et al.  Risk and Reward: Perspectives on the Implementation of Kentucky's School-Based Performance Award Program , 1997 .

[41]  B. Joyce,et al.  Models of Teaching , 2024 .

[42]  Robert F. Dedrick,et al.  The Effect of the Social Organization of Schools on Teachers' Efficacy and Satisfaction. , 1991 .

[43]  W. Firestone,et al.  Performance-Based Assessment and Instructional Change: The Effects of Testing in Maine and Maryland , 1998 .

[44]  James W. Kushman The Organizational Dynamics of Teacher Workplace Commitment: A Study of Urban Elementary and Middle Schools , 1992 .

[45]  John A. Codd Equity and Choice: the paradox of New Zealand educational reform , 1993 .

[46]  A. W. Hoy,et al.  Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement , 2000 .

[47]  G. Salomon Distributed cognitions : psychological and educational considerations , 1997 .

[48]  B. Caldwell,et al.  The Future Of Schools: Lessons From The Reform Of Public Education , 1997 .

[49]  J. Mead,et al.  Developing a Mid-Range Theory To Make Sense of Scaling-Up School Reform: A Cross-Site Case Study of Chicago Public Schools. , 1996 .