Signal correlation between wet and original dry electrodes in electroencephalogram according to the contact impedance of dry electrodes

The development of dry electroencephalogram (EEG) electrodes is a topic of interest. A benefit of using dry EEG electrodes is that they do not require any skin preparation. As a result, the condition of the skin with which the dry electrodes come in contact is always different among experiments. Thus, in order to quantify the performance of EEG recordings using dry electrodes, we need an indicator of signal quality for these electrodes. In this study, we showed that signal quality changed according to the contact impedance between the skin and our dry electrodes. The results indicate that our dry electrodes could record EEG signals with high quality when the contact impedance was less than 350 kμ. However, contact between the skin and an electrode often changes even during experiments, and therefore, we contend that the contact impedance should be reduced to less than 300 kμ for safety reasons.

[1]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[2]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[3]  R. Matthews,et al.  Real time workload classification from an ambulatory wireless EEG system using hybrid EEG electrodes , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Daniel Sánchez Morillo,et al.  Dry EEG Electrodes , 2014, Sensors.

[5]  Wouter A. Serdijn,et al.  Framework for evaluating EEG signal quality of dry electrode recordings , 2013, 2013 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[6]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[7]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  Greg Hajcak,et al.  An Examination of Error-Related Brain Activity and Its Modulation by Error Value in Young Children , 2009, Developmental neuropsychology.

[9]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Sidney J Segalowitz,et al.  Development of Response-Monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-Year-Olds , 2004, Developmental neuropsychology.

[11]  T. Jung,et al.  Dry and Noncontact EEG Sensors for Mobile Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.