Peripheral vision of youths with low vision: motion perception, crowding, and visual search.

PURPOSE Effects of low vision on peripheral visual function are poorly understood, especially in children whose visual skills are still developing. The aim of this study was to measure both central and peripheral visual functions in youths with typical and low vision. Of specific interest was the extent to which measures of foveal function predict performance of peripheral tasks. METHODS We assessed central and peripheral visual functions in youths with typical vision (n = 7, ages 10-17) and low vision (n = 24, ages 9-18). Experimental measures used both static and moving stimuli and included visual crowding, visual search, motion acuity, motion direction discrimination, and multitarget motion comparison. RESULTS In most tasks, visual function was impaired in youths with low vision. Substantial differences, however, were found both between participant groups and, importantly, across different tasks within participant groups. Foveal visual acuity was a modest predictor of peripheral form vision and motion sensitivity in either the central or peripheral field. Despite exhibiting normal motion discriminations in fovea, motion sensitivity of youths with low vision deteriorated in the periphery. This contrasted with typically sighted participants, who showed improved motion sensitivity with increasing eccentricity. Visual search was greatly impaired in youths with low vision. CONCLUSIONS Our results reveal a complex pattern of visual deficits in peripheral vision and indicate a significant role of attentional mechanisms in observed impairments. These deficits were not adequately captured by measures of foveal function, arguing for the importance of independently assessing peripheral visual function.

[1]  Thomas W Raasch,et al.  Development of a Battery of Functional Tests for Low Vision , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  I. Bailey,et al.  Visual Factors and Orientation‐Mobility Performance , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[3]  H. Bouma.  Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[4]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning as a potential treatment for amblyopia: A mini-review , 2009, Vision Research.

[5]  D. Levi.  Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[6]  J. L. Elliott,et al.  Visual Correlates of Mobility in Real World Settings in Older Adults with Low Vision , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  R. Welsh.  Foundations of Orientation and Mobility , 1979 .

[8]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes , 2000, Vision Research.

[10]  E Peli,et al.  Vision Multiplexing: an Engineering Approach to Vision Rehabilitation Device Development , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Improved Motion Perception and Impaired Spatial Suppression following Disruption of Cortical Area MT/V5 , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  E. Peli,et al.  On-Road Driving with Moderate Visual Field Loss , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  P. Lennie,et al.  Visual Impairments: Determining Eligibility for Social Security Benefits , 2002 .

[14]  Jeffrey B. Nyquist,et al.  Spatial and temporal limits of motion perception across variations in speed, eccentricity, and low vision. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[15]  D. Pascolini,et al.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010 , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Wood,et al.  Visual Impairment and Postural Sway among Older Adults with Glaucoma , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  Lei Liu,et al.  Visual search training in subjects with severe to profound low vision , 2007, Vision Research.

[18]  Gregory L. Goodrich,et al.  Change in Visual Perceptual Detection Distances for Low Vision Travelers as a Result of Dynamic Visual Assessment and Training , 2002 .

[19]  K. Turano,et al.  Visual stabilization of posture in persons with central visual field loss. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  K. Turano,et al.  Mobility performance in glaucoma. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  S Ullman,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. , 1987, Science.

[22]  U. Polat,et al.  Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Roth,et al.  Cumulative Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Useful Field of View and Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current and Future Implications , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing , 2003, Nature.

[25]  M. Carrasco.  Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[26]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  G. D. Barnett,et al.  The Activity Inventory: An Adaptive Visual Function Questionnaire , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[29]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Vertical and horizontal motion perception in congenital nystagmus , 1998 .

[30]  Jörgen Gustafsson.  Eccentric correction in central visual field loss , 2001 .

[31]  J. Keeffe,et al.  Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[32]  D. Pelli.  Crowding: a cortical constraint on object recognition , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[34]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[35]  R W Beck,et al.  A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[36]  B. Munoz,et al.  Association of Visual Field Loss and Mobility Performance in Older Adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  K. Turano,et al.  Traditional Measures of Mobility Performance and Retinitis Pigmentosa , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[39]  E. Peli,et al.  Eye movements of patients with tunnel vision while walking. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  C S Green,et al.  Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision , 2007, Psychological science.

[41]  J. Brabyn,et al.  The Smith-Kettlewell Institute (SKI) Longitudinal Study of Vision Function and Its Impact among the Elderly: an Overview , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  C. Owsley,et al.  The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. , 1993, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[43]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[44]  Shahina Pardhan,et al.  Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[45]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Perceptual Learning Reduces Crowding in Amblyopia and in the Normal Periphery , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  D. Marigold.  Role of Peripheral Visual Cues in Online Visual Guidance of Locomotion , 2008, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[48]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[49]  Smith-Kettlewell,et al.  BIOLOGICAL IMAGE MOTION PROCESSING : A REVIEW , 2012 .

[50]  Richard A. Salome,et al.  The Visual Experience , 1990 .

[51]  J. Droulez,et al.  Postural stability in primary open angle glaucoma , 2005, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[52]  Frederick A. Stam.  Guide to the Evaluation of Visual Impairment , 1962 .

[53]  K. Turano,et al.  Visual stabilization of posture in retinitis pigmentosa and in artificially restricted visual fields. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.