A Single-Dose Study of Denosumab in Patients With Various Degrees of Renal Impairment

This 16‐week study evaluated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of denosumab in 55 subjects with renal function ranging from normal to dialysis‐dependent kidney failure. Participants received a single 60‐mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab. Kidney function groups were based on calculations using the Cockcroft‐Gault equation and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance in place when the study was designed. Renal function did not have a significant effect on denosumab pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. These findings suggest denosumab dose adjustment based on glomerular filtration rate is not required. Rapid decreases in serum C‐telopeptide in all groups were sustained throughout the study. The most common adverse events were hypocalcemia (15%), pain in extremity (15%), and nausea (11%). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation was not initially required by the study protocol, but was added during the trial. No subject who received adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation became hypocalcemic. Seven subjects had nadir serum calcium concentrations between 7.5 and <8.0 mg/dL (1.9 and <2.0 mmol/L), and 5 subjects (4 with advanced renal disease) had nadir serum calcium <7.5 mg/dL (<1.9 mmol/L). Two subjects (1 symptomatic, 1 asymptomatic) were hospitalized for intravenous calcium gluconate treatment. At the recommended dose, denosumab is a useful therapeutic option for patients with impaired renal function. Supplementation of calcium and vitamin D is strongly recommended when patients initiate denosumab therapy, particularly in patients with reduced renal function. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[1]  S. Cummings,et al.  Effects of denosumab on fracture and bone mineral density by level of kidney function , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  G. Scagliotti,et al.  Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Carducci,et al.  Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study , 2011, The Lancet.

[4]  J. S. San Martin,et al.  Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover: six-year results of a phase 2 clinical trial. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[5]  Y. Fujiwara,et al.  Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Kidney function and rate of bone loss at the hip and spine: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. , 2010, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[7]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on BMD and Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized, Blinded, Phase 3 Trial , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  P. Kerr,et al.  Bisphosphonates in chronic kidney disease; balancing potential benefits and adverse effects on bone and soft tissue. , 2009, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[11]  S. Cummings,et al.  Renal function and rate of hip bone loss in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  M. Perazella,et al.  Bisphosphonate nephrotoxicity. , 2008, Kidney international.

[13]  P. Miller,et al.  Two‐Year Treatment With Denosumab (AMG 162) in a Randomized Phase 2 Study of Postmenopausal Women With Low BMD , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Measures of Renal Function, BMD, Bone Loss, and Osteoporotic Fracture in Older Adults: The Rancho Bernardo Study , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  P. Miller,et al.  Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density , 2007 .

[16]  P. Kostenuik Osteoprotegerin and RANKL regulate bone resorption, density, geometry and strength. , 2005, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[17]  Steven W. Martin,et al.  A Single‐Dose Placebo‐Controlled Study of AMG 162, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Postmenopausal Women , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  P. Kostenuik,et al.  The Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB Ligand Inhibitor Osteoprotegerin Is a Bone-Protective Agent in a Rat Model of Chronic Renal Insufficiency and Hyperparathyroidism , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  Colin R Dunstan,et al.  A Single‐Dose Placebo‐Controlled Study of AMG 162, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Postmenopausal Women , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  J. Beitz,et al.  Renal failure with the use of zoledronic acid. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Ethan M Balk,et al.  K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[22]  Kdoqi Disclaimer K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[23]  M. Panteghini,et al.  Evaluation of a Fully Automated Assay to Measure C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen in Serum , 2000, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[24]  D. Lacey,et al.  The Ligand for Osteoprotegerin (OPGL) Directly Activates Mature Osteoclasts , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  D. Lacey,et al.  Osteoprotegerin Ligand Is a Cytokine that Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation , 1998, Cell.

[26]  K Yano,et al.  Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. Brasier,et al.  Hungry bone syndrome: clinical and biochemical predictors of its occurrence after parathyroid surgery. , 1988, The American journal of medicine.

[28]  M. H. Gault,et al.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. , 1975, Nephron.