Estimation of the Corneal Young's Modulus In Vivo Based on a Fluid-Filled Spherical-Shell Model with Scheimpflug Imaging

Current intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using air puff could be erroneous without applying proper corrections. Although noncontact tonometry is not considered to be accurate, it is still popularly used by eye clinics. It is thus necessary to extract the correct information from their results. This study proposes a practical approach to correctly measure IOP in vivo. By embedding a new model-based correction to the Corvis® ST, we can extract the corneal Young's modulus from the patient data. This Young's modulus can be used to correct the IOP readings. The tests were applied to 536 right eyes of 536 healthy subjects (228 male and 308 female) between March of 2012 and April of 2016. The tests were applied to patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital and the Hung-Chuo Eye Clinics. The statistical analysis showed that the value for the Young's modulus was independent of all the other parameters collected from the Corvis ST, including the corneal thickness and the intraocular pressure. Therefore, it is important to independently measure the Young's modulus instead of depending on the correlation with the other parameters. This study adds the methodology of measuring corneal stiffness in vivo for ophthalmologists' reference in diagnosis.

[1]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Compliance profile of the human cornea as measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2012, Micron.

[2]  David P Piñero,et al.  Corneal biomechanics: a review , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[3]  S. Yun,et al.  Biomechanical characterization of keratoconus corneas ex vivo with Brillouin microscopy. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  D. Gatinel,et al.  Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  D. Pye,et al.  A clinical description of Ocular Response Analyzer measurements. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  L. Taber Compression of Fluid-Filled Spherical Shells by Rigid Indenters , 1983 .

[7]  M. Lombardo,et al.  Biomechanical changes in the human cornea after transepithelial corneal crosslinking using iontophoresis , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  M. Lanza,et al.  Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices. , 2016, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[9]  D. Patel,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[10]  David Touboul,et al.  Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  Sunil Shah,et al.  The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. , 2006, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[12]  A. Guirao Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  Alessandro Lanza,et al.  Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with a Scheimpflug based device. , 2015, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[14]  J. Alió,et al.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post‐laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  Michele Lanza,et al.  In vivo human corneal deformation analysis with a Scheimpflug camera, a critical review , 2016, Journal of biophotonics.

[16]  A. Corvi,et al.  Investigation into the Elastic Properties of ex vivo Porcine Corneas Subjected to Inflation Test after Cross-Linking Treatment , 2016, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[17]  J. Alió,et al.  Corneal biomechanics, refraction, and corneal aberrometry in keratoconus: an integrated study. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  David C. Pye,et al.  Young’s Modulus in Normal Corneas and the Effect on Applanation Tonometry , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  H. Hatami-Marbini Viscoelastic shear properties of the corneal stroma. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  S. Marcos,et al.  Corneal Viscoelastic Properties from Finite-Element Analysis of In Vivo Air-Puff Deformation , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[22]  William J Dupps,et al.  Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas. , 2008, Experimental eye research.

[24]  O. Abitbol,et al.  Corneal hysteresis measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer® in normal and glaucomatous eyes , 2010, Acta ophthalmologica.

[25]  Hans R Vellara BOptom and,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review , 2014 .

[26]  Sonia H Yoo,et al.  Corneal stromal elasticity and viscoelasticity assessed by atomic force microscopy after different cross linking protocols. , 2015, Experimental eye research.

[27]  Y. Hon,et al.  Repeatability of a novel corneal indentation device for corneal biomechanical measurement , 2015, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[28]  Paulo Fernandes,et al.  Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Different Ocular Conditions and New Measurement Techniques , 2014, ISRN ophthalmology.

[29]  Xinghuai Sun,et al.  A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  R. S. Wall,et al.  Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  D. Brocchetto,et al.  Novos conceitos em modelamento corneano New concepts in corneal reshaping , 2010 .

[32]  Leonhard Euler,et al.  The rational mechanics of flexible or elastic bodies, 1638-1788 : introduction to Leonhardi Euleri Opera omnia, vol. X et XI seriei secundae , 2014 .

[33]  K. Aggarwal,et al.  Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Role of corneal biomechanical properties in applanation tonometry measurements. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[35]  K. Buzard Introduction to biomechanics of the cornea. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[36]  P. A. Mattei,et al.  Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Modification after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Using Scheimpflug-Based Noncontact Tonometer , 2014, BioMed research international.

[37]  Nathan M. Radcliffe,et al.  Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma , 2015, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[38]  Erik Sjøntoft,et al.  In vivo determination of young's modulus for the human cornea , 1987, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[39]  P. McDonnell,et al.  An ultrasonic technique for the measurement of the elastic moduli of human cornea. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[41]  David Touboul,et al.  Biomechanical characteristics of the ectatic cornea , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[42]  R. Vito,et al.  A mechanical model of the cornea: the effects of physiological and surgical factors on radial keratotomy surgery. , 1989, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[43]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: Quantitative analysis , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[44]  Ahmed Elsheikh,et al.  Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  Large Deflection of a Fluid-Filled Spherical Shell Under a Point Load , 1982 .

[46]  Hiroshi Murata,et al.  The usefulness of CorvisST Tonometry and the Ocular Response Analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[47]  V. Galvis,et al.  Biomecánica de la córnea , 2005 .

[48]  M Á Ariza-Gracia,et al.  Automatized Patient-Specific Methodology for Numerical Determination of Biomechanical Corneal Response , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  F. Raiskup,et al.  Identification of Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea: The Ocular Response Analyzer , 2012, Current eye research.

[50]  D. Luce Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[51]  T. Wong,et al.  Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[52]  Y. Zheng,et al.  Determining in vivo elasticity and viscosity with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging analysis in keratoconic and healthy eyes , 2016, Journal of biophotonics.

[53]  C. Roberts,et al.  A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[54]  B Jean,et al.  Dynamic mechanical spectroscopy of the cornea for measurement of its viscoelastic properties in vitro. , 1995, German journal of ophthalmology.

[55]  D. Brocchetto,et al.  Novos conceitos em modelamento corneano , 2010 .

[56]  Y. Zheng,et al.  Measurement of corneal tangent modulus using ultrasound indentation. , 2016, Ultrasonics.

[57]  Y. Hon,et al.  Corneal Deformation Measurement Using Scheimpflug Noncontact Tonometry , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.