The cost implications of informed decision-making: a mathematical simulation model of the potential financial effects of a web-based prostate specific antigen decision aid

A i m and Objectives: Web-based Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) decision aids are known to promote informed decision-making. There is also some evidence that informed decision-making can result in reduced uptake of PSA testing, thus reducing subsequent costs related to urological intervention, specifically prostate biopsies. The aim of this study was to assess these potential financial benefits. The objectives were: first, to develop a mathematical simulation model based on data from a randomised controlled trial of a web-based PSA decision aid, Prosdex; second, to examine the effect of changes in PSA testing on prostate biopsy numbers and costs. M e t hods: The simulation model was built using an animated simulation package, Simul8, which allowed for the input of parameter data: 1) Setting; 2) Intention to undertake a PSA test, derived from a RCT of a web-based PSA decision aid; 3) Costs related to PSA tests and prostate biopsies. R e s ults: Total costs varied with changes in the number of PSA tests at a single GP practice, all-Wales and UK level. At the single GP practice level, the effect on costs of changes in PSA testing was minimal. For example, a reduction in PSA testing from 4.6% to 3.6% reduced total costs for the practice by only £1,800. At the UK level, the same reduction in PSA testing lowered costs by approximately £10 million; a relatively small amount of financial resource in the context of a national health budget such as that of the UK National Health Service. Conclusions: The financial impact of web-based PSA decision aids is minimal. The benefit of using PSA decision aids should be viewed in ethical terms and not in financial terms.

[1]  Christina Bougatsos,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Prostate‐specific antigen testing rates remain low in UK general practice: a cross‐sectional study in six English cities , 2011, BJU international.

[3]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Supporting Informed Decision Making for Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing on the Web: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  H. Yasunaga,et al.  Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening with prostate‐specific antigen , 2008, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[8]  S. Moss,et al.  Urological referral of asymptomatic men in general practice in England , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  Seth Falcon,et al.  Impact of PSA Screening on the Incidence of Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer in the United States: A Surveillance Modeling Approach , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  L. Curtis,et al.  Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2016 , 2015 .

[12]  D. Ekwueme,et al.  Cost Analysis of Screening for, Diagnosing, and Staging Prostate Cancer Based on a Systematic Review of Published Studies , 2007, Preventing chronic disease.

[13]  James J. Solberg,et al.  Operations Research: Principles And Practice, 2Nd Ed , 2007 .

[14]  Jeff D. Griffiths,et al.  Modelling treatment effects in the HIV/AIDS epidemic , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  R. Eeles,et al.  The feasibility and results of a population-based approach to evaluating prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer in men with a raised familial risk , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Reduction in uptake of PSA tests following decision aids: systematic review of current aids and their evaluations. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  E. Feuer,et al.  The use of modeling to understand the impact of screening on US mortality: examples from mammography and PSA testing , 2004, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  S. Moss,et al.  Rates of prostate‐specific antigen testing in general practice in England and Wales in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a cross‐sectional study , 2004, BJU international.

[19]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? , 2003, JAMA.

[20]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[21]  T. Marshall,et al.  Resource implications and health benefits of primary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease in people aged 30 to 74: mathematical modelling study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  T. Marteau,et al.  A measure of informed choice , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[23]  Ann Netten,et al.  Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2002 , 2000 .

[24]  J. Donovan,et al.  Diagnosis, management and screening of early localised prostate cancer. , 1997, Health technology assessment.

[25]  W. Catalona,et al.  Management of cancer of the prostate. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  James J. Solberg,et al.  Operations Research: Principles and Practice. , 1977 .