Hierarchical models for smoothed population indices: the importance of considering variations in trends of count data among sites

Population indices quantify changes in relative population sizes, which underpin much of basic ecology and conservation science. However, temporal changes in population counts may vary among survey sites for both ecological and artificial reasons, confounding existing population indices estimated without accounting for such variations. We created a smoothed hierarchical model, and compared its performance against the conventional approaches (generalized linear models and generalized additive models) and a non-smoothed hierarchical model using simulation data with a known nonlinear trend. The smoothed hierarchical model always estimated population indices with the best accuracy and precision; the performance of other models deteriorated substantially with increasing variation in trends of population counts among sites, causing inaccurate estimation of population growth rates. The estimated variations in trends of population counts among sites for 233 out of 518 North American breeding bird species were larger than the value used in the simulation where there was a considerable difference in the performance between hierarchical models and the conventional approaches. These estimated variations in trends of population counts among sites were particularly large in gregarious waterbirds. These results suggest that the smoothed hierarchical model developed in this study should play an important role in accurately assessing population indices, particularly for gregarious waterbirds, using count data from large-scale, long-term surveys in the field.

[1]  R. Bunce,et al.  Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales , 2000 .

[2]  Wayne E. Thogmartin,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL MODEL OF AVIAN ABUNDANCE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS , 2004 .

[3]  L. Carrascal,et al.  Interspecific differences in population trends of Spanish birds are related to habitat and climatic preferences , 2007 .

[4]  Len Thomas,et al.  Monitoring Long‐Term Population Change: Why are there so Many Analysis Methods? , 1996 .

[5]  D. Noble,et al.  Developing indicators for European birds , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  T. Brereton,et al.  The Re-expansion and Improving Status of the Silver-spotted Skipper Butterfly (hesperia Comma) in Britain: a Metapopulation Success Story , 2005 .

[7]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Trend estimation in populations with imperfect detection , 2009 .

[8]  Ben Collen,et al.  Monitoring Change in Vertebrate Abundance: the Living Planet Index , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  The Conservation Handbook: Research, Management and Policy , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[10]  G. Mace,et al.  The 2010 Biodiversity Indicators: Challenges for Science and Policy , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R , 2005 .

[12]  R. Gregory,et al.  International Conservation Policy Delivers Benefits for Birds in Europe , 2007, Science.

[13]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Cyclic Dynamics in a Simple Vertebrate Predator-Prey Community , 2003, Science.

[14]  J. Randers,et al.  The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  S. Chown,et al.  A Global Indicator for Biological Invasion , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[17]  E. Virgós,et al.  Is the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) a threatened species in spain? Sociological constraints in the conservation of species , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[18]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  The Convention on Biological Diversity's 2010 Target , 2005, Science.

[19]  R.G.M. Kwak,et al.  Bird numbers 1992 , 1994 .

[20]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Hidden process models for animal population dynamics. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[21]  Catherine A Calder,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  W. Link,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF POPULATION CHANGE WITH APPLICATION TO CERULEAN WARBLERS , 2002 .

[23]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect , 2005 .

[24]  R. Mcdonald,et al.  Decline of invasive alien mink (Mustela vison) is concurrent with recovery of native otters (Lutra lutra) , 2007 .

[25]  W. Sutherland,et al.  A framework for monitoring the status of populations: An example from wader populations in the East Asian–Australasian flyway , 2010 .

[26]  A typology of indicators of biodiversity change as a tool to make better indicators , 2009 .

[27]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Measuring the changing state of nature , 2003 .

[28]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[29]  W. Link,et al.  Observer differences in the North American Breeding Bird Survey , 1994 .

[30]  D. Maes,et al.  Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands and Flanders: the first results , 1997, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[31]  Kiona Ogle,et al.  Hierarchical bayesian statistics: merging experimental and modeling approaches in ecology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  John H. Steele,et al.  A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems , 1985, Nature.

[33]  Jessamy Battersby UK Mammals: Species Status and Population Trends. First Report by the Tracking Mammals Partnership , 2005 .

[34]  W. Link,et al.  Seasonal components of avian population change: joint analysis of two large-scale monitoring programs. , 2007, Ecology.

[35]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  The variability of population densities , 1988, Nature.

[36]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Population trends of European common birds are predicted by characteristics of their climatic niche , 2010 .

[37]  Å. Lindström,et al.  Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification , 2006 .

[38]  Modelling the European Farmland Bird Indicator in response to forecast land-use change in Europe , 2011 .

[39]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  ANALYSIS OF POPULATION TRENDS FOR FARMLAND BIRDS USING GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODELS , 2000 .

[40]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[41]  K. F. Conrad,et al.  Long-term population trends in widespread British moths , 2004, Journal Of Insect Conservation.

[42]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Census error and the detection of density dependence. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.