Evolutionary dynamics on graphs

Evolutionary dynamics have been traditionally studied in the context of homogeneous or spatially extended populations. Here we generalize population structure by arranging individuals on a graph. Each vertex represents an individual. The weighted edges denote reproductive rates which govern how often individuals place offspring into adjacent vertices. The homogeneous population, described by the Moran process, is the special case of a fully connected graph with evenly weighted edges. Spatial structures are described by graphs where vertices are connected with their nearest neighbours. We also explore evolution on random and scale-free networks. We determine the fixation probability of mutants, and characterize those graphs for which fixation behaviour is identical to that of a homogeneous population. Furthermore, some graphs act as suppressors and others as amplifiers of selection. It is even possible to find graphs that guarantee the fixation of any advantageous mutant. We also study frequency-dependent selection and show that the outcome of evolutionary games can depend entirely on the structure of the underlying graph. Evolutionary graph theory has many fascinating applications ranging from ecology to multi-cellular organization and economics.

[1]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  Strong and weak tests of macroecological theory , 2003 .

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  The Fastest Mixing Markov Process on a Graph and a Connection to a Maximum Variance Unfolding Problem , 2006, SIAM Rev..

[4]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[5]  T. Liggett,et al.  Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes , 1999 .

[6]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Effective number of alleles in a subdivided population. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[8]  F. W. Preston.  The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species , 1948 .

[9]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[10]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Markov chain models predict the consequences of experimental extinctions , 2004 .

[11]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Paine,et al.  Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength , 1992, Nature.

[13]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Coevolutionary games on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  Random processes in genetics , 1958, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  J. Wootton,et al.  PREDICTION IN COMPLEX COMMUNITIES: ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICALLY DERIVED MARKOV MODELS , 2001 .

[16]  M. Nowak,et al.  THE SPATIAL DILEMMAS OF EVOLUTION , 1993 .

[17]  J. Connell.  The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[18]  Claudia Neuhauser,et al.  Mathematical Challenges in Spatial Ecology , 2001 .

[19]  B. Bollobás.  The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[20]  M. Slatkin.  FIXATION PROBABILITIES AND FIXATION TIMES IN A SUBDIVIDED POPULATION , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  THEORETICAL CONCEPTS AND EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO MEASURING INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1998 .

[22]  B Skyrms,et al.  A dynamic model of social network formation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[24]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation , 2000 .

[25]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[26]  I. Weissman,et al.  Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells , 2001, Nature.

[27]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[28]  M. Nowak.  Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[29]  M. Kuperman,et al.  Social games in a social network. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[31]  J. Wootton,et al.  ESTIMATES AND TESTS OF PER CAPITA INTERACTION STRENGTH: DIET, ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF INTERTIDALLY FORAGING BIRDS , 1997 .

[32]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Patterns of species interaction strength in assembled theoretical competition communities , 1999 .

[33]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs , 1997, Coral Reefs.

[34]  Sandip Roy,et al.  The influence model , 2001 .

[35]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[36]  H. William Hunt,et al.  Influence of Productivity on the Stability of Real and Model Ecosystems , 1993, Science.

[37]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Fastest Mixing Markov Chain on a Graph , 2004, SIAM Rev..

[38]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Numerical analysis of random drift in a cline. , 1980, Genetics.

[39]  M N,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population , 1996 .

[40]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[41]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[42]  Peter B. Adler,et al.  NEUTRAL MODELS FAIL TO REPRODUCE OBSERVED SPECIES–AREA AND SPECIES–TIME RELATIONSHIPS IN KANSAS GRASSLANDS , 2004 .

[43]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[44]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[45]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Community Structure: A Neutral Model Analysis , 1976 .

[46]  R. Paine,et al.  Ecological Determinism in the Competition for Space: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 1984 .

[47]  Robert M. May,et al.  Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics , 1994, Nature.

[48]  R A Fisher,et al.  The “Sewall Wright Effect” , 1950, Heredity.

[49]  M. Whitlock.  Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. , 2003, Genetics.

[50]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The probability of fixation of a favoured allele in a subdivided population , 1993 .

[51]  G. Bell.  Neutral macroecology. , 2001, Science.

[52]  C. Huffaker.  Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[53]  Barbara Drossel,et al.  The impact of nonlinear functional responses on the long-term evolution of food web structure. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.