Users' personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: The case for resistance to change

[1]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[3]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change , 2006 .

[4]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[5]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[6]  Briony D. Pulford,et al.  The influence of personality on HE students’ confidence in their academic abilities , 2006 .

[7]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Comparing Faculty Information Seeking in Teaching and Research : Implications for the Design of Digital Libraries , 2005 .

[8]  Dan Dolderman,et al.  Personality predictors of Consumerism and Environmentalism: A preliminary study , 2007 .

[9]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: the moderating effect of openness to experience. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Joseph W. Janes,et al.  Other People's Judgments: A Comparison of Users' and Others' Judgments of Document Relevance, Topicality, and Utility , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  David Greathead,et al.  Does personality matter?: an analysis of code-review ability , 2007, CACM.

[13]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Cellular automata modeling of resistance to innovations: Effects and solutions , 2004 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries? , 2004, CACM.

[16]  James J. Jiang,et al.  User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Theresa M. Welbourne,et al.  Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. , 1999 .

[18]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[19]  Jong-Ae Kim,et al.  Toward an understanding of Web-based subscription database acceptance , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less , 1996 .

[21]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[22]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: What are the Roles of Interface Characteristics, Organizational Context, and Individual Differences? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Michael A. Jones,et al.  The product-specific nature of impulse buying tendency , 2003 .

[24]  MaryEllen C. Sievert,et al.  Investigating computer anxiety in an academic library , 1988 .

[25]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Information processing, situation specificity, and the generality of risk-taking behavior , 1972 .

[26]  S. Oreg.  Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change , 2006 .

[27]  Jane Webster,et al.  Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Corey M. Angst,et al.  Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs in Technology Acceptance , 2006 .

[29]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[30]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  Assessing the value of information , 1989, ICIS '89.

[32]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[33]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2002, MIS Q..

[34]  Karen van Dam,et al.  Employee attitudes toward job changes: An application and extension of Rusbult and Farrell's investment model , 2005 .

[35]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[36]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[37]  Oded Nov,et al.  Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[39]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  The Interactive Effects of Personal Traits and Experienced States on Intraindividual Patterns of Citizenship Behavior , 2006 .

[41]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[44]  S. Budner.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[45]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Walter Mischel,et al.  Toward an integrative science of the person. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  P. Boeck,et al.  From anger to verbal aggression: Inhibition at different levels , 2007 .

[48]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[49]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[50]  Albert A. Angehrn,et al.  Understanding Organizational Dynamics of IT-Enabled Change: A Multimedia Simulation Approach , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..