Multiarterial coronary artery bypass grafting: is the radial artery fulfilling the unkept promise of the right internal thoracic artery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW The debate on the second best conduit for CABG is still intense. In this review, we discuss the role of the radial artery and the right internal thoracic artery (RITA) compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVG). RECENT FINDINGS The recent RADIAL STUDY has been the first evidence based on randomized trials of a clinical benefit using a second arterial graft in CABG.On the other hand, the definitive 10-year results of the ART trial failed to show a clinical advantage associated with the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA). A thorough and contextualized analysis of this and other studies, however, may offer a different perspective. SUMMARY Arterial conduits in CABG have shown better patency rates than SVG. Whether this leads to better clinical outcomes is still debated. In this setting, the radial artery and the RITA seem to offer a similar advantage, although with different indications and contraindications.

[1]  S. Fremes,et al.  Radial artery versus saphenous vein as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta‐analysis , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  J. Pepper,et al.  Bilateral versus Single Internal‐Thoracic‐Artery Grafts at 10 Years , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  F. D’Ascenzo,et al.  Radial Artery Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as the Second Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Clinical Outcomes , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[4]  S. Oh,et al.  Saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery as a Y‐composite graft: Five‐year angiographic and clinical results of a randomized trial , 2018, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  C. Royse,et al.  21-Year Survival of Left Internal Mammary Artery-Radial Artery-Y Graft. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[7]  G. Angelini,et al.  Radial‐Artery or Saphenous‐Vein Grafts in Coronary‐Artery Bypass Surgery , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Operative Outcomes of Multiple-Arterial Versus Single-Arterial Coronary Bypass Grafting. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  F. D’Ascenzo,et al.  Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies Comparing Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta‐Analysis , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[10]  M. Baiocchi,et al.  Second Arterial Versus Venous Conduits for Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in California , 2017, Circulation.

[11]  J. Alexander,et al.  Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial—rationale and study protocol† , 2017, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Associations Between Adding a Radial Artery Graft to Single and Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts and Outcomes: Insights From the Arterial Revascularization Trial , 2017, Circulation.

[13]  D. Taggart,et al.  Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis , 2017, Heart.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Caputo,et al.  Right internal thoracic artery versus radial artery as the second best arterial conduit: Insights from a meta-analysis of propensity-matched data on long-term survival. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  Toshiro Ito,et al.  Histomorphologic superiority of internal thoracic arteries over right gastroepiploic arteries for coronary bypass. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  J. D. Mitchell,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  P. Otasevic,et al.  Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up , 2015, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[19]  S. Fremes,et al.  The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Multi Versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  S. Verma,et al.  Symptomatic graft failure and impact on clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: Results from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry. , 2015, American heart journal.

[22]  S. Mamchur,et al.  Micromorphology of Skeletonized and Pedicled Internal Thoracic and Radial Arteries. , 2015, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Long-term Patency of Endoscopically Harvested Radial Arteries: From a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Innovations.

[24]  F. Crea,et al.  Technical issues in the use of the radial artery as a coronary artery bypass conduit. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  D. Altman,et al.  Effect of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafts on Long-Term Survival: A Meta-Analysis Approach , 2014, Circulation.

[26]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Optimal conduit for diabetic patients: propensity analysis of radial and right internal thoracic arteries. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  H. Wu,et al.  Radial artery graft vs. saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass surgery , 2014, Herz.

[28]  H. Takagi,et al.  A meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[29]  B. Buxton,et al.  Mid-term results of the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes randomized trial. , 2013, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[30]  D. Taggart,et al.  A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2013, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[31]  R. Virmani,et al.  Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? , 2013, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[32]  D. Souza,et al.  The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[33]  P. Erwin,et al.  Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[34]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  R. Califf,et al.  Relationship Between Vein Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2012, Circulation.

[36]  Suk-Won Song,et al.  Comparison of the Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein as Composite Grafts in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, Korean circulation journal.

[37]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[38]  Janet S. Wright,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesi , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  K. Grove,et al.  Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[40]  B. Buxton,et al.  The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.

[41]  D. Reda,et al.  Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[42]  Xu-jun Chen,et al.  Radial artery as conduit is safe and effective in coronary bypass surgery in the elderly: single-central results from 326 patients. , 2009, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[43]  R. Coppola,et al.  Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: Direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[44]  N. Moat,et al.  Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency Randomized Trial: Five-Year Angiographic Follow-Up , 2008, Circulation.

[45]  L. Bojö,et al.  Harvesting the saphenous vein with surrounding tissue for CABG provides long-term graft patency comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: results of a randomized longitudinal trial. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[46]  F. Burzotta,et al.  Arterial Versus Venous Bypass Grafts in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis , 2005, Circulation.

[47]  G. Rizzoli,et al.  Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approach. , 2002, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[48]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries , 2001, The Lancet.

[49]  B. Chaitman,et al.  All-artery multigraft coronary artery bypass grafting with only internal thoracic arteries possible and safe: a randomized trial. , 2000, Surgery.

[50]  M. Komeda,et al.  Comparative histopathology of radial artery versus internal thoracic artery and risk factors for development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. , 1999, Circulation.

[51]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  A. Albanese,et al.  Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials†. , 2015, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[53]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[54]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The second best arterial graft: a propensity analysis of the radial artery versus the free right internal thoracic artery to bypass the circumflex coronary artery. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[55]  N. Desai,et al.  Radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[56]  M. Metra,et al.  Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.