Determination of bleb capsule porosity with an experimental glaucoma drainage device and measurement system.

IMPORTANCE Control of intraocular pressure after implantation of a glaucoma drainage device (GDD) depends on the porosity of the capsule that forms around the plate of the GDD. OBJECTIVE To compare capsular porosity after insertion of 2 different GDDs using a novel implant and measurement system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS We performed an experimental interventional study at an eye research facility in a tertiary eye care center. Testing was performed on 22 adult New Zealand white rabbits that received the experimental GDD or an existing GDD. INTERVENTIONS A new experimental GDD, the Center for Eye Research Australia (CERA) implant, was created using computer-aided design and a 3-dimensional printer. The CERA GDDs were implanted in the eyes of rabbits randomized into 1 of the following 3 groups: with no connection to the anterior chamber (n = 7), with connection to the anterior chamber for 1 week (n = 5), and with connection to the anterior chamber for 4 weeks (n = 5). In a control group (n = 5), a pediatric GDD was implanted without connection to the anterior chamber. We measured the capsular porosity using a pressure-gated picoliter pump at a driving pressure of 12 mm Hg. The animals were killed humanely for histologic study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Porosity of the fibrous capsule around the implant. RESULTS We found no difference in mean (SEM) capsular porosity between the CERA (3.39 [0.76; 95% CI, 1.43-5.48] µL/min) and pediatric (4.52 [0.52; 95% CI, 3.19-5.95] µL/min) GDDs (P = .28, unpaired t test) at 4 weeks without aqueous exposure. Mean (SEM) capsular porosity of CERA GDDs connected to the anterior chamber at 1 week was 2.46 (0.36; 95% CI, 1.55-3.44) µL/min but decreased to 0.67 (0.07; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86) µL/min at 4 weeks (P = .001, unpaired t test). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Our experimental method permits direct measurement of capsular porosity of an in situ GDD. In a comparison between an experimental (CERA) and an existing GDD, no differences were identified in capsular porosity or histologic reaction between the implants. These results suggest that the CERA GDD model can be used to test key components of glaucoma surgery and implant design.

[1]  K. Jung,et al.  Foreign body reaction in glaucoma drainage implant surgery. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  M. Coote,et al.  A model to measure fluid outflow in rabbit capsules post glaucoma implant surgery. , 2012, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[3]  David W. Smith,et al.  Computational Modeling of Fluid Flow and Intra-Ocular Pressure following Glaucoma Surgery , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  B. Ravi,et al.  Revision of Broken Knee Megaprostheses: New Solution to Old Problems , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[6]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Advances in three dimensional printing – state of the art and future perspectives , 2006 .

[7]  S. Gedde,et al.  Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparison of types , 2006, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[8]  M. Sherwood.  A sequential, multiple-treatment, targeted approach to reduce wound healing and failure of glaucoma filtration surgery in a rabbit model (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). , 2006, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[9]  A. Molteno,et al.  Otago Glaucoma Surgery Outcome Study: factors controlling capsule fibrosis around Molteno implants with histopathological correlation. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Minckler,et al.  In vitro and in vivo flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[11]  D. Minckler,et al.  Experimental studies of aqueous filtration using the Molteno implant. , 1987, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[12]  J. Powell.  National Athletic Injury/Illness Reporting System: Eye Injuries in College Wrestling , 1981, International ophthalmology clinics.

[13]  R. Mapstone.  Outflow changes in normal eyes after closed-angle glaucoma. , 1977, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Loewenthal Lm.  Trabeculectomy as treatment for glaucoma: a preliminary report. , 1977 .

[15]  A. Molteno,et al.  Long tube implants in the management of glaucoma. , 1976, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.