Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances.

Recycling of materials from municipal solid waste is commonly considered to be superior to any other waste treatment alternative. For the material fractions with a significant energy content this might not be the case if the treatment alternative is a waste-to-energy plant with high energy recovery rates. The environmental impacts from recycling and from incineration of six material fractions in household waste have been compared through life cycle assessment assuming high-performance technologies for material recycling as well as for waste incineration. The results showed that there are environmental benefits when recycling paper, glass, steel and aluminium instead of incinerating it. For cardboard and plastic the results were more unclear, depending on the level of energy recovery at the incineration plant, the system boundaries chosen and which impact category was in focus. Further, the environmental impact potentials from collection, pre-treatment and transport was compared to the environmental benefit from recycling and this showed that with the right means of transport, recyclables can in most cases be transported long distances. However, the results also showed that recycling of some of the material fractions can only contribute marginally in improving the overall waste management system taking into consideration their limited content in average Danish household waste.

[1]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  The ecological relevance of transport in waste disposal systems in Western Europe. , 2007, Waste management.

[2]  Janus T Kirkeby,et al.  Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[3]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Chemical composition of material fractions in Danish household waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[4]  Rodrigo Diaz,et al.  Modelling greenhouse gas emissions for municipal solid waste management strategies in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada , 2008 .

[5]  Jeffrey Morris,et al.  Comparative LCAs for Curbside Recycling Versus Either Landfilling or Incineration with Energy Recovery (12 pp) , 2005 .

[6]  Peter Holm,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy--a Danish case study on waste paper. , 2007, Waste management.

[7]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling , 1999 .

[8]  Mufide Banar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. , 2009, Waste management.

[9]  Jannick Højrup Schmidt.  LCA af forsøg med indsamling af ikke-pantbelagt drikkevareemballage af plast og metal i eksisterende glasbeholdere , 2005 .

[10]  Risto Soukka,et al.  Comparison of energy and material recovery of household waste management from the environmental point of view : Case Kaunas, Lithuania , 2009 .

[11]  Matti Melanen,et al.  Combining ecological and economic assessment of options for newspaper waste management , 2007 .

[12]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Paper waste - recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments. , 2007, Waste management.

[13]  Sara Tyskeng,et al.  Energi- och miljömässiga skillnader mellan materialåtervinning och energiutvinning av avfall : en litteratursammanställning , 2007 .

[14]  A R Grayson,et al.  Environmental Report 2007 , 2008 .

[15]  Anna Björklund,et al.  What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. , 2007, Waste management.

[16]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Life cycle assessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration: recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluated in the ROAD-RES model. , 2007, Waste management.

[17]  Thomas Højlund Christensen,et al.  Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration , 2008 .

[18]  Jiri Hyks,et al.  Long-term leaching from MSWI air-pollution-control residues: leaching characterization and modeling. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Comparison of ecological effects and costs of communal waste management systems , 2004 .

[20]  Forbes R McDougall,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Lifecycle Inventory , 1995 .

[21]  D. W. Edwards,et al.  Municipal Waste Life Cycle Assessment: Part 2: Transport Analysis and Glass Case Study , 1999 .

[22]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration. , 2010, Waste management.

[23]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results , 2005 .

[24]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[25]  Christian Riber,et al.  Environmental assessment of waste incineration in a life-cycle-perspective (EASEWASTE) , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.