Uncertainty Analysis and Calibration of SWMM Using a Formal, Bayesian Methodology

Importance of uncertainty analysis (UA) to estimate the degree of reliability associated with model predictions is being understood. Consequently, literature that describes various Bayesian methods for the assessment of parameter and model predictive uncertainty has been steadily rising. Applications dealing with urban stormwater management are, however, very limited. This study demonstrates successful application of a formal Bayesian methodology for UA of the U.S. EPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM), a widely used urban stormwater management model, and illustrates the methodology using a highly urbanized watershed in southern California. DREAM(ZS), a recently developed effective and efficient sampling algorithm, and a generalized, formal likelihood function that addresses the assumptions commonly made regarding error structure including independence, normality and homoscedasticity are used for the UA. Results will include comparison of the simulated error structure with the assumptions made by the likelihood function, histogram of the parameters posteriors, bounds of the 95 percent confidence interval, and the maximum likelihood (ML) predictions. A conventional calibration attempted to compare the ML results derived from the UA with the optimal solutions identified by the single objective calibration will also be presented. Besides illustrating state-ofthe-art in UA, the study will highlight application of the methodology to developing a watershed management model to mitigate stormwater quantity and quality problems associated with urbanization.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[2]  J. Vrugt,et al.  A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non‐Gaussian errors , 2010 .

[3]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration , 2007 .

[4]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Improving Model Performance Using Season-Based Evaluation , 2012 .

[5]  K. Beven,et al.  Comment on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?” by Jasper A. Vrugt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Hoshin V. Gupta and Bruce A. Robinson , 2009 .

[6]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method , 2008 .

[7]  P. Mantovan,et al.  Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology , 2006 .

[8]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model , 2005 .

[10]  D. Kavetski,et al.  Towards a Bayesian total error analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Characterising model error using storm-dependent parameters , 2006 .

[11]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[12]  C. Diks,et al.  Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation , 2005 .

[13]  James E Ball Discussion of “Automatic Calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM Model for a Large Urban Catchment” by J. Barco, K. M. Wong, and M. K. Stenstrom , 2009 .

[14]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. , 2008, Water research.

[15]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? , 2009 .

[17]  Surface Drainage,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF STORM DRAIN SOURCES OF CONTAMINANTS TO SANTA MONICA BAY , 1993 .

[18]  Michael K. Stenstrom,et al.  Automatic Calibration of the U.S. EPA SWMM Model for a Large Urban Catchment , 2008 .

[19]  James E Ball,et al.  Evaluation of spatially variable control parameters in a complex catchment modelling system : a genetic algorithm application , 2007 .