Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration

This article discusses how Aristotle’s thought on rhetoric can help public administrators deal with situations that involve conflicting and irreconcilable values. We argue that Aristotelian rhetoric can be helpful to public administrators in dealing with value conflicts, because it promotes a greater self-consciousness among administrators about their own values, encourages them to seek ways of accommodating their values to the values of others, discourages any sense of finality in resolving value conflicts, and requires that administrators take account of the concrete specifics of particular practical situations in dealing with value conflicts.

[1]  Nancy S. Struever The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences , 1989 .

[2]  I. Berlin,et al.  Four Essays on Liberty , 1969 .

[3]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[4]  Hugh T. Miller,et al.  Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse , 1994 .

[5]  Layne Swanberg GORGIAS , 2003, The Classical Review.

[6]  Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos Southern Political Science Association Politics , Speech , and the Art of Persuasion : Toward an Aristotelian Conception of the Public Sphere , 2007 .

[7]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Public Management As Art, Science, and Profession , 1996 .

[8]  C. Stivers Resisting the Ascendancy of Public Management: Normative Theory and Public Administration , 2000 .

[9]  D. Farmer,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner and the Uses of Rhetoric , 2003 .

[10]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[11]  Richard Bellamy,et al.  The morality of freedom , 1988 .

[12]  Donald N. McCloskey,et al.  Rhetoric Of The Human Sciences: Language And Argument In Scholarship And Public Affairs , 1987 .

[13]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving , 1979 .

[14]  S. M. Delevan,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Public Administration Journal Publications , 1994 .

[15]  H. Wagenaar VALUE PLURALISM IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION , 1999 .

[16]  Aristotle,et al.  On rhetoric : a theory of civic discourse , 1993 .

[17]  David Carr,et al.  Plural and Conflicting Values , 1991 .

[18]  Robert Zinke,et al.  The Rhetorical Way of Knowing and Public Administration , 1993 .

[19]  M. Nichols Aristotle's Defense of Rhetoric , 1987, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  Robert Silvers,et al.  The legacy of Isaiah Berlin , 2001 .

[21]  Michael Oakeshott Rationalism in politics and other essays , 1962 .

[22]  D. Waldo,et al.  The Administrative State , 1948 .

[23]  L. Karp Against the current , 1984 .

[24]  B. Ross,et al.  Concepts and Categories , 1994 .

[25]  D. Farmer The Allure of Rhetoric and the Truancy of Poetry , 2003, Post-Traditional Public Administration Theory.

[26]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Virtue Ethics: A Misleading Category? , 1999, Areté.