PET/MR in Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer is an international public health concern in which an optimal treatment plan requires a precise staging. Both MRI and PET imaging techniques have made significant progress in the last decades with constant improvements that made both modalities clinically relevant in several stages of breast cancer management and follow-up. On one hand, specific breast MRI permits high diagnostic accuracy for local tumor staging, and whole-body MRI can also be of great use in distant staging, eventually accompanied by organ-specific MRI sequences. Moreover, many different MRI sequences can be performed, including functional MRI, letting us foresee important improvements in breast cancer characterization in the future. On the contrary, (18)F-FDG-PET has a high diagnostic performance for the detection of distant metastases, and several other tracers currently under development may profoundly affect breast cancer management in the future with better determination of different types of breast cancers allowing personalized treatments. As a consequence PET/MR is a promising emerging technology, and it is foreseeable that in cases where both PET and MRI data are needed, a hybrid acquisition is justified when available. However, at this stage of deployment of such hybrid scanners in a clinical setting, more data are needed to demonstrate their added value beyond just patient comfort of having to undergo a single examination instead of two, and the higher confidence of diagnostic interpretation of these co-registered images. Optimized imaging protocols are still being developed and are prone to provide more efficient hybrid protocols with a potential improvement in diagnostic accuracy. More convincing studies with larger number of patients as well as cost-effectiveness studies are needed. This article provides insights into the current state-of-the-art of PET/MR in patients with breast cancer and gives an outlook on future developments of both imaging techniques and potential applications in the future.

[1]  Nicolas Aide,et al.  Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems? , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  D. Plewes,et al.  Systematic Review: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Screen Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[4]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Physiologic Changes in Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging during the Menstrual Cycle: Perfusion Imaging, Signal Enhancement, and Influence of the T1 Relaxation Time of Breast Tissue , 2005, The breast journal.

[5]  Heoung Keun Kang,et al.  FDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases: usefulness and limitations. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  K. Någren,et al.  Uptake of 11C-methionine in breast cancer studied by PET. An association with the size of S-phase fraction. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Les Irwig,et al.  Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Value of Retrospective Fusion of PET and MR Images in Detection of Hepatic Metastases: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA–Enhanced MRI , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  J. Parry,et al.  MicroPET Imaging of Breast Cancer Using Radiolabeled Bombesin Analogs Targeting the Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptor , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  M. Sütterlin,et al.  [Whole-body MRI in preoperative diagnostics of breast cancer--a comparison with [corrected] staging methods according to the S 3 guidelines]. , 2011, RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (Print).

[11]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid PET/MRI Systems: A 4-Class Tissue Segmentation Technique Using a Combined Ultrashort-Echo-Time/Dixon MRI Sequence , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  A. Alavi,et al.  Comparison of triple‐negative and estrogen receptor‐positive/progesterone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters , 2008, Cancer.

[13]  V. Seshan,et al.  Feasibility and Predictability of Perioperative PET and Estrogen Receptor Ligand in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  L. Galuska,et al.  The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  V. Kapoor,et al.  An introduction to PET-CT imaging. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  R. A. Valdés Olmos,et al.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET , 2012, Journal of oncology.

[17]  Handel E. Reynolds,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® stage I breast carcinoma. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[18]  Andrea Soricelli,et al.  Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[19]  D. Groheux,et al.  Effect of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with clinical Stage II and III breast cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al.  Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast , 2014, Journal of surgical oncology.

[21]  Evelyn Wenkel,et al.  Toward simultaneous PET/MR breast imaging: systematic evaluation and integration of a radiofrequency breast coil. , 2013, Medical physics.

[22]  Tomio Inoue,et al.  Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006-2007. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  C. Boetes,et al.  # The Author(s) 2008 , 2007 .

[24]  Torsten Mattfeldt,et al.  FDG uptake in breast cancer: correlation with biological and clinical prognostic parameters , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Early metabolic response to neoadjuvant letrozole, measured by FDG PET/CT, is correlated with a decrease in the Ki67 labeling index in patients with hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer: a pilot study , 2011, Breast cancer.

[26]  D. Groheux,et al.  Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer. , 2013, Radiology.

[27]  David A Mankoff,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[28]  Georg Schramm,et al.  Influence and Compensation of Truncation Artifacts in MR-Based Attenuation Correction in PET/MR , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  E. Rutgers,et al.  The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional imaging techniques. , 2010, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[30]  C. Mader,et al.  Discrimination and anatomical mapping of PET-positive lesions: comparison of CT attenuation-corrected PET images with coregistered MR and CT images in the abdomen , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  K. Yoo,et al.  Postmenopausal obesity as a breast cancer risk factor according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status (Japan). , 2001, Cancer letters.

[32]  B. Ljung,et al.  Breast cancer version 3.2014. , 2014, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[33]  I D Wilkinson,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[34]  Axel Haase,et al.  A 16-channel MR coil for simultaneous PET/MR imaging in breast cancer , 2015, European Radiology.

[35]  H. Kaida,et al.  Glucose transporter expression of intraductal papilloma of the breast detected by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography , 2011, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[36]  David A Mankoff,et al.  Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[37]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[39]  H. Linden,et al.  Novel methods and tracers for breast cancer imaging. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[40]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[41]  W. Yang,et al.  False-positive lesions mimicking breast cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  P. Drew,et al.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced high field magnetic resonance imaging in women with primary breast cancer scheduled for wide local excision (COMICE). , 2010, Health Technology Assessment.

[43]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[44]  C. Binkert,et al.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted whole body MRI and skeletal scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate or breast carcinoma , 2010, Skeletal Radiology.

[45]  P. Neven,et al.  Additional Value of PET–CT in Staging of Clinical Stage IIB and III Breast Cancer , 2010, The breast journal.

[46]  E. Conant,et al.  The impact of FDG PET in the staging of breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  F. Cardoso,et al.  Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[48]  S. van Esser,et al.  Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET - randomised controlled trial. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[49]  K. Hede Preoperative MRI in breast cancer grows contentious. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[50]  A. Drzezga,et al.  First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[51]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Whole-body nonenhanced PET/MR versus PET/CT in the staging and restaging of cancers: preliminary observations. , 2014, Radiology.

[52]  J L Sunshine,et al.  Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.

[53]  Handel E. Reynolds,et al.  ACR appropriateness criteria palpable breast masses. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[54]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Detection Rate, Location, and Size of Pulmonary Nodules in Trimodality PET/CT-MR: Comparison of Low-Dose CT and Dixon-Based MR Imaging , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[55]  E. Mittra,et al.  (18)F-FPPRGD2 PET/CT: pilot phase evaluation of breast cancer patients. , 2014, Radiology.

[56]  Simulation and evaluation of a high resolution VIP PEM system with a dedicated LM-OSEM algorithm. , 2014, Journal of instrumentation : an IOP and SISSA journal.

[57]  R. Sadeghi,et al.  Diagnostic value of 99mTc-bombesin scintigraphy for differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions , 2014, Nuclear medicine communications.

[58]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  PET/CT versus body coil PET/MRI: how low can you go? , 2013, Insights into Imaging.

[59]  E. Mittra,et al.  Novel Strategy for a Cocktail 18F-Fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan for Evaluation of Malignancy: Results of the Pilot-Phase Study , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  C. Sirtori,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Visualization of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques at the Brachiocephalic Artery of Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice by the Blood-Pool Contrast Agent B22956/1 , 2014, Molecular imaging.

[61]  Maximilian F. Reiser,et al.  Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Oncology , 2007, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[62]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Detection of extra-axillary lymph node involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage II-III breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[63]  Andrew Hanby,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[64]  Selin Carkaci,et al.  Inflammatory breast cancer: PET/CT, MRI, mammography, and sonography findings , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[65]  J. Zeuthen,et al.  Gastrin releasing peptide GRP(14–27) in human breast cancer cells and in small cell lung cancer , 1991, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[66]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer , 2011, European Radiology.

[67]  A. Jena,et al.  imultaneous whole-body 18 F-FDG PET-MRI in primary staging of reast cancer : A pilot study , 2014 .

[68]  M. A. van den Bosch,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A literature review and future perspectives. , 2014, World journal of clinical oncology.

[69]  R. Coleman,et al.  Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[70]  J. Bading,et al.  Imaging of Cell Proliferation: Status and Prospects , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[71]  M. Plana,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis , 2011, European Radiology.

[72]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[73]  Robert Sacré,et al.  Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging—initial findings , 2006, European Radiology.

[74]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on nonpalpable mammographic findings (excluding calcifications). , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[75]  B. Kimler,et al.  Integrated FDG-PET/CT for initial staging of breast cancer , 2007 .

[76]  T. Kinoshita,et al.  Comparative study of the value of dual tracer PET/CT in evaluating breast cancer , 2012, Cancer science.

[77]  J. Biederer,et al.  MRI of pulmonary nodules: technique and diagnostic value , 2008, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[78]  P. L. Jager,et al.  Biodistribution of 89Zr‐trastuzumab and PET Imaging of HER2‐Positive Lesions in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[79]  A. Alavi,et al.  Impact of FDG PET on the preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[80]  M. I. Rosa,et al.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[81]  J. Katzenellenbogen Designing steroid receptor-based radiotracers to image breast and prostate tumors. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[82]  D. Fuster,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[83]  Paul J. van Diest,et al.  Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography , 2002 .

[84]  B. Kim,et al.  Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2012, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[85]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  111In-Trastuzumab Scintigraphy in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Remains Feasible during Trastuzumab Treatment , 2014, Molecular imaging.

[86]  D. Belkić,et al.  Molecular imaging in the framework of personalized cancer medicine. , 2013, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[87]  A. Kjær,et al.  Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[88]  Matthew J Hayat,et al.  Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. , 2007, The oncologist.

[89]  D. Groheux,et al.  Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[90]  M. J. García-Velloso,et al.  Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[91]  Alessandro Giordano,et al.  Diagnostic performance of dedicated positron emission mammography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in women with suspicious breast lesions: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Clinical breast cancer.

[92]  C. Xie,et al.  A new, preoperative, MRI-based scoring system for diagnosing malignant axillary lymph nodes in women evaluated for breast cancer. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[93]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[94]  P Sismondi,et al.  Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[95]  Jingfei Ma Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[96]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge: should we recommend it? , 2011, European Radiology.

[97]  Young-Taek Oh,et al.  Can initial diagnostic PET-CT aid to localize tumor bed in breast cancer radiotherapy: feasibility study using deformable image registration , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[98]  D. Fuster,et al.  PET/CT with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose in the assessment of metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 2012, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[99]  C. Kuhl Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. , 2007, Radiology.

[100]  A. Luini,et al.  A comparative study on the value of FDG-PET and sentinel node biopsy to identify occult axillary metastases. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[101]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in Breast Cancer: Comparison with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient from Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[102]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[103]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Meta-analysis of agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumour size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[104]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[105]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[106]  C. Geppert,et al.  Pulmonary nodules in patients with primary malignancy: comparison of hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[107]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Role of Fusion of Prone FDG‐PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breasts in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer , 2010, The breast journal.

[108]  O. Schillaci,et al.  99MTC [13LEU] bombesin and a new gamma camera, the imaging probe, are able to guide mammotome breast biopsy. , 2003, Anticancer research.

[109]  Xiaoguang Sun,et al.  FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[110]  Eric C Ford,et al.  Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and CT for delineation of lumpectomy cavity for partial breast irradiation. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[111]  Les Irwig,et al.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[112]  Eric O. Aboagye,et al.  Imaging early changes in proliferation at 1 week post chemotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer patients with 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[113]  N Houssami,et al.  Early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: systematic review of the accuracy of MRI. , 2012, Breast.

[114]  H. Redmond,et al.  Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Systematic Review , 2012, Annals of surgical oncology.

[115]  E. Imhoff,et al.  Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer , 2004, European Radiology.

[116]  M. Greco,et al.  Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and postoperative histopathology, hormone receptor status, thymidine labelling index and p53 in primary breast cancer: a preliminary observation , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[117]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer. , 2008, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[118]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[119]  C. Kuhl The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. , 2007, Radiology.

[120]  G. Vlastos,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic correlates of preoperative FDG PET for breast cancer , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[121]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  (18)F, (64)Cu, and (68)Ga labeled RGD-bombesin heterodimeric peptides for PET imaging of breast cancer. , 2009, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[122]  Patrick Veit-Haibach,et al.  Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[123]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[124]  M. Piccart,et al.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)† , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[125]  Jinsun Lee,et al.  Selective Sentinel Node Plus Additional Non-Sentinel Node Biopsy Based on an FDG-PET/CT Scan in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Single Institutional Experience , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[126]  A. Alavi,et al.  Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG–PET in primary breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.