A comparative study of metamodeling methods for the design optimization of variable stiffness composites

Abstract Automated fiber placement is a manufacturing technology that enables to build composite laminates with curvilinear fibers. To determine their optimum mechanical properties, finite element analysis is commonly used as a solver within an optimization framework. The analysis of laminates with curvilinear fibers coupled with the fiber path optimization requires a large number of function evaluations, each time-consuming. To reduce the time for analysis and thus for optimization, a metamodel is often proposed. This work examines a set of metamodeling techniques for the design optimization of composite laminates with variable stiffness. Three case studies are considered. The first two pertain to the fiber path design of a plate under uniform compression. The third concerns the optimization of a composite cylinder under pure bending. Four metamodeling methods, namely Polynomial Regression, Radial Basis Functions, Kriging and Support Vector Regression, are tested, and their performance is compared. Accuracy, robustness, and suitability for integration within an optimization framework are the appraisal criteria. The results show that the most accurate and robust models in exploring the design space are Kriging and Radial Basis Functions. The suitability of Kriging is the highest for a low number of design variables, whereas the best choice for a high number of variables is Radial Basis Functions.

[1]  Ya-Jung Lee,et al.  Regression of the response surface of laminated composite structures , 2003 .

[2]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[3]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Optimization of a composite cylinder under bending by tailoring stiffness properties in circumferential direction , 2010 .

[4]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Cross-Validation of Regression Models , 1984 .

[5]  L. Lessard,et al.  Surrogate-based multi-objective optimization of a composite laminate with curvilinear fibers , 2012 .

[6]  A. Keane,et al.  Evolutionary Optimization of Computationally Expensive Problems via Surrogate Modeling , 2003 .

[7]  Z. Gürdal,et al.  In-plane response of laminates with spatially varying fiber orientations - Variable stiffness concept , 1993 .

[8]  Richard Simon,et al.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Janis Auzins,et al.  Surrogate modeling in design optimization of stiffened composite shells , 2006 .

[10]  R. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Optimization with Parallel Simulations using the Probability of Improvement , 2010 .

[11]  S. Gunn.  Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression , 1998 .

[12]  Z. Gürdal,et al.  Variable stiffness composite panels : Effects of stiffness variation on the in-plane and buckling response , 2008 .

[13]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Making the Most Out of Surrogate Models: Tricks of the Trade , 2010, DAC 2010.

[14]  S. Rippa,et al.  Numerical Procedures for Surface Fitting of Scattered Data by Radial Functions , 1986 .

[15]  Z. Gürdal,et al.  Design of variable-stiffness conical shells for maximum fundamental eigenfrequency , 2008 .

[16]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Metamodels for simulation input-output relations , 1992, WSC '92.

[17]  Abbas S. Milani,et al.  Layout optimization of a multi-zoned, multi-layered composite wing under free vibration , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[18]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Metamodeling Methodology for Postbuckling Simulation of Damaged Composite Stiffened Structures with Physical Validation , 2010 .

[19]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Post-buckling optimisation of composite stiffened panels using neural networks , 2002 .

[20]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[21]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007, DAC 2006.

[22]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Optimization of variable stiffness composites with embedded defects induced by Automated Fiber Placement , 2014 .

[23]  Yao Lin,et al.  An Efficient Robust Concept Exploration Method and Sequential Exploratory Experimental Design , 2004 .

[24]  Luca Lanzi,et al.  Post-buckling optimization of composite stiffened panels: Computations and experiments , 2006 .

[25]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[26]  F.-X. Irisarri,et al.  Computational strategy for multiobjective optimization of composite stiffened panels , 2011 .

[27]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Two-level composite wing structural optimization using response surfaces , 2000 .

[28]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[29]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[30]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[31]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Defect layer method to capture effect of gaps and overlaps in variable stiffness laminates made by Automated Fiber Placement , 2013 .

[32]  Ya-Jung Lee,et al.  Stacking sequence optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithm with local improvement , 2004 .

[33]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .