Characterising the performance of qualitative analytical methods: Statistics and terminology

This article presents an overview of statistical methods used in validation and proficiency testing for qualitative testing in analytical chemistry, paying particular attention to interlaboratory study. A definition of "qualitative analysis" that allows a general treatment of a wide variety of different examples is used. We discuss the characterisation of qualitative method performance, and consider in detail methods for the analysis of false response rates. We review appropriate statistical methods for a variety of circumstances, including the application of logistic regression to interlaboratory and intralaboratory studies of method performance. Finally, we propose provisional recommendations for the design and statistical treatment of validation and proficiency studies. Crown Copyright (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Burns,et al.  Generic scheme for independent performance assessment in the molecular biology laboratory. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  A. V. van Loon,et al.  European Proficiency Testing Program for Molecular Detection and Quantitation of Hepatitis B Virus DNA , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  PerspectiveQuantifying uncertainty in qualitative analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Edgar Studer,et al.  Quantitative competitive PCR for the detection of genetically modified organisms in food , 1999 .

[5]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2002 .

[6]  M. Thompson,et al.  The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of (chemical) analytical laboratories (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[7]  Lloyd A. Currie,et al.  DETECTION : INTERNATIONAL UPDATE, AND SOME EMERGING DI-LEMMAS INVOLVING CALIBRATION, THE BLANK, AND MULTIPLE DETECTION DECISIONS , 1997 .

[8]  Mario Pazzagli,et al.  External quality assurance program for PCR amplification of genomic DNA: an Italian experience. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  M. Shoukri,et al.  Measures of Interobserver Agreement , 2003 .

[10]  Philip Feldsine,et al.  AOAC International methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.

[11]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  Analysing collaborative trials for qualitative microbiological methods: accordance and concordance. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[12]  W. J Youden,et al.  Statistical Manual of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists , 1984 .

[13]  W. A. Hardcastle.  Qualitative Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice , 1998 .

[14]  J. Fox.  Nonparametric Regression Appendix to An R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression , 2002 .

[15]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[16]  I. Ruisanchez,et al.  Validation of qualitative analytical methods , 2004 .

[17]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  Uncertainties in qualitative testing and analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[19]  Kaj Heydorn,et al.  Quality assurance of qualitative analysis in the framework of the European project ’MEQUALAN’ , 2003 .

[20]  Bert Popping,et al.  Validation studies and proficiency testing. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.