Monitoring Movements in Development Aid: Recursive Partnerships and Infrastructures

An examination of emerging information infrastructures that are intended to increase accountability and effectiveness in partnerships for development aid. In Monitoring Movements in Development Aid, Casper Jensen and Brit Winthereik consider the processes, social practices, and infrastructures that are emerging to monitor development aid, discussing both empirical phenomena and their methodological and analytical challenges. Jensen and Winthereik focus on efforts by aid organizations to make better use of information technology; they analyze a range of development aid information infrastructures created to increase accountability and effectiveness. They find that constructing these infrastructures is not simply a matter of designing and implementing technology but entails forging new platforms for action that are simultaneously imaginative and practical, conceptual and technical. After presenting an analytical platform that draws on science and technology studies and the anthropology of development, Jensen and Winthereik present an ethnography- based analysis of the mutually defining relationship between aid partnerships and infrastructures; the crucial role of users (both actual and envisioned) in aid information infrastructures; efforts to make aid information dynamic and accessible; existing monitoring activities of an environmental NGO; and national-level performance audits, which encompass concerns of both external control and organizational learning. Jensen and Winthereik argue that central to the emerging movement to monitor development aid is the blurring of means and ends: aid information infrastructures are both technological platforms for knowledge about aid and forms of aid and empowerment in their own right.

[1]  L. Thevenot,et al.  Rules and implements: investment in forms , 1984 .

[2]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[3]  M. Zhan,et al.  Other-Worldly: Making Chinese Medicine through Transnational Frames , 2009 .

[4]  Helen Verran,et al.  Ethnographic stories as generalizations that intervene , 2012 .

[5]  Anne Beaulieu,et al.  Messy Shapes of Knowledge - STS Explores Informatization, New Media, and Academic Work. The Virtual Knowledge Studio , 2008 .

[6]  Eduardo Viveiros de Castro,et al.  Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies , 2004 .

[7]  Brit Ross Winthereik,et al.  ICT and Integrated Care: Some Dilemmas of Standardising Inter-Organisational Communication , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Raymond Williams Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society , 1976 .

[9]  Brit Ross Winthereik,et al.  The Project Multiple: Enactments of systems development , 2010, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[11]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[12]  Yusuna Z Ya'u Globalisation, ICTs, and the New Imperialism: Perspectives on Africa in the Global Electronic Village (GEV) , 2005 .

[13]  Helen Verran,et al.  Science and an African logic , 2001 .

[14]  Brian Balmer,et al.  Home on the Range , 2007 .

[15]  B. R. Winthereik,et al.  When patients care (too much) for information , 2010, Care in Practice.

[16]  Helen Verran,et al.  A Postcolonial Moment in Science Studies , 2002 .

[17]  Kwok-Fu Wong Empowerment as a panacea for poverty - old wine in new bottles? Reflections on the World Bank’s conception of power , 2003 .

[18]  A. Tsing,et al.  Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection by Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing , 2009, Transforming Anthropology.