Biomass characteristics and membrane aeration: toward a better understanding of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs).

Fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs) was studied under different operating conditions and with varying biomass characteristics. Fouling rates were determined using a flux-step method for seven biomass conditions with mixed liquor solids concentrations ranging from 4.3 to 13.5 g x l(-1), six permeate fluxes (5.5, 11.0, 16.5, 22.0, 27.5, and 33.0 l x m(-2) x h(-1)), and three membrane airflow velocities (0.07, 0.10, and 0.13 m x s(-1)). Statistical analysis was used to specify the degree of influence of each of the biomass characteristics (solids concentration, dewaterability, viscosity, particle size distribution, concentrations of protein and carbohydrate in the soluble microbial products, SMP, and extracellular polymer substances, EPS), the permeate flux and the membrane aeration velocity on the membrane fouling rate. Among all these variables, only the permeate flux, the solids concentration (correlated to the viscosity and the dewaterability), the carbohydrate concentration in the EPS, and the membrane aeration velocity were found to affect the fouling rate. The permeate flux had the greatest effect. A transitional permeate flux was observed between 16.5 and 33 l x m(-2) x h(-1), below which no significant fouling was observed regardless of the biomass characteristics, the permeate flux, and the membrane aeration velocity.

[1]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[2]  El Hani Bouhabila,et al.  Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors , 2001 .

[3]  Sungpyo Hong,et al.  Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactors , 2002 .

[4]  Thomas Arnot,et al.  Controlling fouling in membrane bioreactors operated with a variable throughput , 2002 .

[5]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[6]  Quantitative determination of fouling layer composition in the microfiltration of beer , 2001 .

[7]  J. Tay,et al.  Operational factors of submerged inorganic membrane bioreactor for organic wastewater treatment: sludge concentration and aeration rate. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Xia Huang,et al.  Effect of operational parameters on sludge accumulation on membrane surfaces in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[9]  P. Bishop,et al.  Comparison of extraction methods for quantifying extracellular polymers in biofilms , 1999 .

[10]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Filtration of biomass with laboratory‐scale submerged hollow fibre modules – effect of operating conditions and module configuration , 2002 .

[11]  F. Smith,et al.  Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances , 1956 .

[12]  Simon Judd,et al.  Impact of aeration, solids concentration and membrane characteristics on the hydraulic performance of a membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[13]  H. Nagaoka,et al.  Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process , 1996 .

[14]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical flux operation of a membrane bioreactor , 2002 .

[15]  Rui Liu,et al.  Study on hydraulic characteristics in a submerged membrane bioreactor process , 2000 .

[16]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system -- the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling , 1998 .

[17]  Hang-Sik Shin,et al.  Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors , 2003 .

[18]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge , 2001 .