Moving beyond Pseudoargumentation: Teachers' Enactments of an Educative Science Curriculum Focused on Argumentation.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Katherine L. McNeill | Suzanna Loper | María González‐Howard | María González-Howard | Rebecca Katsh-Singer | Rebecca Katsh-Singer | S. Loper
[1] Maria Evagorou,et al. Argumentation in the Teaching of Science , 2011 .
[2] Walter G. Secada,et al. Urban Elementary School Teachers' Knowledge and Practices in Teaching Science to English Language Learners. , 2008 .
[3] Diana C. Rice,et al. Discourse of Making Sense of Data: Implications for Elementary Teachers’ Science Education , 2010 .
[4] John Wallace,et al. Multimedia Cases, Teacher Education and Teacher Learning , 2008 .
[5] Kathleen J. Roth,et al. Videobased Lesson Analysis: Effective Science PD for Teacher and Student Learning , 2011 .
[6] Rebecca Schneider,et al. Opportunities for Teacher Learning During Enactment of Inquiry Science Curriculum Materials: Exploring the Potential for Teacher Educative Materials , 2013 .
[7] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation , 2011 .
[8] Ralph T. Putnam,et al. What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .
[9] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards , 2014 .
[10] S. Michaels,et al. Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life , 2008 .
[11] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation , 2009 .
[12] David Hammer,et al. Framing for scientific argumentation , 2012 .
[13] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[14] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Investigating Teacher Learning Supports in High School Biology Curricular Programs to Inform the Design of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2009 .
[15] Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al. Investigating Elementary Students' Scientific and Historical Argumentation , 2013 .
[16] Katherine L. McNeill. Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena , 2009 .
[17] J. Krajcik,et al. Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .
[18] Ronald D. Anderson,et al. Changing teachers' practice: curriculum materials and science education reform in the USA , 2002 .
[19] B. Reiser,et al. Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .
[20] Iris Tabak,et al. Synergy: A Complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[21] Joseph Krajcik,et al. A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[22] Laurence Viennot,et al. Designing Strategies and Tools for Teacher Training: The Role of Critical Details, Examples in Optics. , 2005 .
[23] D. Ball,et al. Reform by the Book: What Is—or Might Be—the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? , 1996 .
[24] Carol L. O'Donnell. Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K–12 Curriculum Intervention Research , 2008 .
[25] Joseph L. Polman,et al. Dialogic Activity Structures for Project-Based Learning Environments , 2004 .
[26] K. Hakuta,et al. Challenges and Opportunities for Language Learning in the Context of the CCSS and the NGSS. , 2013 .
[27] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .
[28] L. Bryan. Research on Science Teacher Beliefs , 2012 .
[29] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Scientific Argumentation for All? Comparing Teacher Beliefs About Argumentation in High, Mid, and Low Socioeconomic Status Schools , 2016 .
[30] Andy Cavagnetto,et al. Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy , 2010 .
[31] Anat Zohar,et al. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .
[32] Michael J. Ford,et al. A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning , 2012 .
[33] Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al. Interacting with a Suite of Educative Features: Elementary Science Teachers' Use of Educative Curriculum Materials. , 2016 .
[34] Victor Sampson,et al. Research Article Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice , 2012 .
[35] Kent J. Crippen,et al. Argument as Professional Development: Impacting Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs About Science , 2012 .
[36] William A. Sandoval,et al. Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification† , 2011 .
[37] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions , 2008 .
[38] P. David Pearson,et al. Literacy and Science: Each in the Service of the Other , 2010, Science.
[39] Roy D. Pea,et al. The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[40] W. Penuel,et al. Investigating Purposeful Science Curriculum Adaptation as a Strategy to Improve Teaching and Learning , 2017 .
[41] Leema K. Berland,et al. Explaining Variation in How Classroom Communities Adapt the Practice of Scientific Argumentation , 2011 .
[42] P. David Pearson,et al. The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms , 2012 .
[43] J. Osborne,et al. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .
[44] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. The Impact of High School Science Teachers’ Beliefs, Curricular Enactments and Experience on Student Learning During an Inquiry-based Urban Ecology Curriculum , 2013 .
[45] Shirley Simon,et al. Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .
[46] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .
[47] Elizabeth A. Davis,et al. Teachers and science curriculum materials: where we are and where we need to go , 2016 .
[48] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science Teacher Education , 2006 .
[49] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K–12 Teachers , 2013 .
[50] Shawn Y. Stevens,et al. Understanding Pedagogical Design Capacity through Teachers' Narratives. , 2011 .
[51] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess high-quality PCK rather than pseudoargumentation , 2016 .
[52] J. Remillard. Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .
[53] Kathleen J. Roth,et al. What Science Teaching Looks Like: An International Perspective. , 2007 .
[54] D. Cohen. A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier , 1990 .
[55] Jonathan Osborne,et al. Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse , 2010, Science.
[56] John B. Black,et al. The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .
[57] Joseph Krajcik,et al. An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project‐based science , 2009 .