Sediment delivery estimates in water quality models altered by resolution and source of topographic data.

Moderate-resolution (30-m) digital elevation models (DEMs) are normally used to estimate slope for the parameterization of non-point source, process-based water quality models. These models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), use the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and Modified USLE to estimate sediment loss. The slope length and steepness factor, a critical parameter in USLE, significantly affects sediment loss estimates. Depending on slope range, a twofold difference in slope estimation potentially results in as little as 50% change or as much as 250% change in the LS factor and subsequent sediment estimation. Recently, the availability of much finer-resolution (∼3 m) DEMs derived from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data has increased. However, the use of these data may not always be appropriate because slope values derived from fine spatial resolution DEMs are usually significantly higher than slopes derived from coarser DEMs. This increased slope results in considerable variability in modeled sediment output. This paper addresses the implications of parameterizing models using slope values calculated from DEMs with different spatial resolutions (90, 30, 10, and 3 m) and sources. Overall, we observed over a 2.5-fold increase in slope when using a 3-m instead of a 90-m DEM, which increased modeled soil loss using the USLE calculation by 130%. Care should be taken when using LiDAR-derived DEMs to parameterize water quality models because doing so can result in significantly higher slopes, which considerably alter modeled sediment loss.

[1]  Thomas M. Isenhart,et al.  Optimizing the placement of riparian practices in a watershed using terrain analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Effect of GIS data quality on small watershed stream flow and sediment simulations , 2005 .

[3]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[4]  R. A. Norton,et al.  Investigation in Erosion Control and the Reclamation of Eroded Land at the Missouri Valley Loess Conservation Experiment Station, Clarinda, Iowa, 1931-42 , 1948 .

[5]  John R. Williams,et al.  Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. , 1977 .

[6]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling , 2009 .

[7]  Timothy A. Cohn,et al.  Load Estimator (LOADEST): A FORTRAN Program for Estimating Constituent Loads in Streams and Rivers , 2004 .

[8]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[9]  Martin Flood,et al.  Laser altimetry : From science to commercial lidar mapping , 2001 .

[10]  Garey A. Fox,et al.  A quantitative phosphorus loss assessment tool for agricultural fields , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Mark D. Tomer,et al.  Do soil surveys and terrain analyses identify similar priority sites for conservation , 2004 .

[12]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[13]  G. R. Foster,et al.  RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation , 1991 .

[14]  E. J. Sadler,et al.  The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[15]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[16]  Kyle R. Douglas-Mankin,et al.  Field-Level Targeting Using SWAT: Mapping Output from HRUs to Fields and Assessing Limitations of GIS Input Data , 2011 .

[17]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Selection and placement of best management practices used to reduce water quality degradation in Lincoln Lake watershed , 2011 .

[18]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[19]  Matthew J. Helmers,et al.  Rating curve estimation of nutrient loads in Iowa rivers , 2011 .

[20]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[21]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Evaluation and Spatially Distributed Analyses of Proposed Cost-Effective BMPs for Reducing Phosphorous Level in Cedar Creek Reservoir, Texas , 2010 .

[22]  Sung-Min Cho,et al.  SENSITIVITY CONSIDERATIONS WHEN MODELING HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES WITH DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL 1 , 2001 .

[23]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Estimating soil loss on topographically non-uniform field and farm units , 1988 .

[24]  Allen T. Hjelmfelt,et al.  DEM AGGREGATION FOR WATERSHED MODELING 1 , 2000 .

[25]  Peter L. Guth,et al.  Geomorphometry from SRTM: Comparison to NED , 2006 .

[26]  Richard H. White,et al.  Simulating water quality improvements in the Upper North Bosque River watershed due to phosphorus export through turfgrass sod , 2006 .

[27]  I. Moore,et al.  Length-slope factors for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation: simplified method of estimation , 1992 .

[28]  Vincent Chaplot,et al.  Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO3-N loads predictions , 2005 .

[29]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude , 2006 .

[30]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[31]  Joseph R. Makuch,et al.  The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[32]  Ross Purves,et al.  Resolution Sensitivity of a Compound Terrain Derivative as Computed from LiDAR-Based Elevation Data , 2007, AGILE Conf..

[33]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .

[34]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  WATER QUALITY MODEL OUTPUT UNCERTAINTY AS AFFECTED BY SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF INPUT DATA 1 , 2003 .

[35]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Comparative hydrology across AmeriFlux sites: The variable roles of climate, vegetation, and groundwater , 2011 .

[36]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[37]  J. Arnold,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A COASTAL PLAIN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED , 2004 .

[38]  Dean B. Gesch,et al.  The National Map - Elevation , 2009 .

[39]  Mark D. Tomer,et al.  Treatments of Precipitation Inputs to Hydrologic Models , 2011 .