Objective – This study examined the effects that mentioning the survey incentive prize in the subject line of a reminder email had on the response rate and data quality. To date, manipulation of the subject line, specifically in terms of mentioning the incentive prize, has received limited attention in the survey design literature.
Methods – The delivery of the survey invitation is discussed in terms of the timing of the launch and reminder emails. Particular emphasis is given to the design of the email subject line and justification of the format. Weekly response rates from four LibQUAL+TM surveys were compared. In addition, weekly responses for one year were analyzed using SPSS to investigate if there were any between means differences in terms of three elements of data quality. The three elements were: length of time it took to complete the survey, the number of core questions with an N/A response, and the number of illogical responses where minimum scores were higher than desired.
Results – The response rates for the second week were grouped together based on the presence or absence of the subject line manipulation. There was a significant difference between these means (4.75%, p 0.033). There was no statistical difference in regards to the measures of data quality as determined by a one-way ANOVA test.
Conclusions – Reminding survey participants with an email that mentions the incentive prize in the subject line appears to increase response rates with no deleterious effects on data quality. The results of this investigation are encouraging, and those running the LibQUAL+TM survey in their universities should consider implementing this method to increase response rates. Further research to replicate these findings in other contexts and using an experimental design would be beneficial.
[1]
Stephen R. Porter,et al.
The Impact of Lottery Incentives on Student Survey Response Rates
,
2003
.
[2]
R. Kent,et al.
Improving Email Response in a Permission Marketing Context
,
2003
.
[3]
Anja S. Göritz,et al.
Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review
,
2006
.
[4]
Dirk Heerwegh,et al.
An Investigation of the Effect of Lotteries on Web Survey Response Rates
,
2006
.
[5]
Juan Sánchez-Fernández,et al.
Improving retention rate and response quality in Web-based surveys
,
2012,
Comput. Hum. Behav..
[6]
Russel L. Thompson,et al.
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
,
2000
.
[7]
Alex R. Trouteaud.
How You Ask Counts
,
2004
.
[8]
Michael P. Linegang,et al.
Effects of Cover Letter Subject Line and Open-ended Question Response Area on Responding to an Internet Survey
,
2012
.
[9]
J. Nutefall,et al.
"We Thought It Might Encourage Participation." Using Lottery Incentives to Improve LibQUAL+[TM] Response Rates among Students.
,
2012
.
[10]
Amber N. Manzo,et al.
Increasing Response Rate in Web-Based/Internet Surveys
,
2012
.
[11]
Stephen R. Porter,et al.
E-mail Subject Lines and Their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response
,
2005
.