Creative conceptual design: Extending the scope by infused design

Many methods that support human creativity by manual or computational means have been proposed in the past. They rely on the assumption that following a certain process of reasoning might lead to generating ideas considered creative. We start by defining creativity as a capability that enables the creation of systems that are patentable. We review the state-of-the-art of creative conceptual design and organize it with a framework. Subsequently, we present a method called infused design that guarantees the generation of design solutions by transforming systems and methods from remote disciplines. In many cases, these solutions would be deemed creative. Finding these systems and their transformations is done through a process based on the underlying discrete mathematical representation. This process is partially supported by a computer tool. We describe the method of infused design and illustrate its operation through part of the results achieved until now, including designing a new active torque amplifier system. We further demonstrate its benefits through other examples. We discuss the relation of infused design with other creativity or design methods and conclude with future developments of the method. ''A well-directed imagination is the source of great deeds.'' Chinese proverb

[1]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Improving the Rationale Capture Capability of QFD , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[2]  Richard L. Divine,et al.  Creativity + business discipline = higher profits faster from new product development , 1999 .

[3]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A-Design: An Agent-Based Approach to Conceptual Design in a Dynamic Environment , 1999 .

[4]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[5]  Todd Lubart,et al.  How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Symmetry of ignorance, social creativity, and meta-design , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[7]  Y. Reich,et al.  Designing Contexts for Learning Design * , 2022 .

[8]  Larry Leifer,et al.  Design-Team Performance: Metrics and the Impact of Technology , 1998 .

[9]  Offer Shai,et al.  DESIGN THROUGH COMMON GRAPH REPRESENTATIONS , 2003 .

[10]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[11]  K. C Ng,et al.  Electrical network theory , 1977 .

[12]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge , 2004 .

[13]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[14]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused Creativity: An Approach to Creative System Design , 2005 .

[15]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[16]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[17]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Hearing Colors, Tasting Shapes , 2003 .

[18]  Yoram Reich,et al.  A framework for organizing the space of decision problems with application to solving subjective, context-dependent problems , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  INFLUENCE OF DESIGN REPRESENTATION ON EFFECTIVENESS OF IDEA GENERATION , 2001 .

[21]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[22]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[23]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity , 1993 .

[24]  D. Hocevar,et al.  A Taxonomy and Critique of Measurements Used in the Study of Creativity , 1989 .

[25]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry , 1998 .

[26]  Avigdor Zonnenshain,et al.  Design quality metrics used as a quantitative tool for the conceptual design of a new product , 2001 .

[27]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused design. I. Theory , 2004 .

[28]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Creativity or creativities? , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Coaching product development teams: a conceptual foundation for empirical studies , 2009 .

[30]  Shean Juinn Chiou,et al.  Automated conceptual design of mechanisms , 1999 .

[31]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  An approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanical conceptual design. Part I: Introduction and knowledge representation , 1994 .

[32]  Offer Shai,et al.  Representing and analysing integrated engineering systems through combinatorial representations , 2004, Engineering with Computers.

[33]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Building Agility for Developing Agile Design Information Systems , 1999 .

[34]  Nicholas P. Chironis,et al.  Mechanisms, Linkages and Mechanical Controls , 1965 .

[35]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[37]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused design. II. Practice , 2004 .

[38]  P. Paulus Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups , 2000 .

[39]  Offer Shai,et al.  Transforming engineering problems through graph representations , 2003, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[40]  Offer Shai,et al.  Utilization of the dualism between determinate trusses and mechanisms , 2002 .

[41]  Thomas T. Hewett,et al.  Informing the design of computer-based environments to support creativity , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Matthew J. Streeter,et al.  Evolving inventions. , 2003, Scientific American.

[44]  Offer Shai,et al.  The multidisciplinary combinatorial approach (MCA) and its applications in engineering , 2001, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[45]  Ashok K. Goel Design, Analogy, and Creativity , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[46]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[47]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[48]  John S. Gero,et al.  Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[49]  R. Sternberg Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[50]  Greg A. Stevens,et al.  3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success! , 1997 .

[51]  Offer Shai,et al.  A Study of the Duality Between Planar Kinematics and Statics , 2006 .

[52]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[53]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  A case-based framework for reuse of previous design concepts in conceptual synthesis of mechanisms , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[54]  Brian R. Gaines WebGrid: Knowledge Modeling and Inference through the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[55]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[56]  Offer Shai,et al.  The duality relation between mechanisms and trusses , 2001 .

[57]  J. Gero,et al.  Constructive Representation in Situated Analogy in Design , 2001 .

[58]  Yoram Reich,et al.  SOS – subjective objective system for generating optimal product concepts , 2005 .