Settlement response of fibre reinforced railway ballast

Ballasted track is the prevalent track form worldwide and with good design and maintenance can satisfy high performance demands including those of high speed lines. However, increasingly onerous loading is being placed on existing ballasted track networks in many parts of the world by more frequent, longer, faster and heavier trains. This leads to reduced windows of time for maintenance activities while simultaneously increasing maintenance needs. Therefore there are potential advantages if ballasted track could be modified to increase durability both in terms of intervals between maintenance interventions, e.g. tamping, and overall life cycle. This paper presents an assessment of the potential for randomly reinforced ballast, a mixture of ballast and fibres of selected dimensions and properties, to increase the durability of railway track. Compared with other types of reinforcement, fibres have potential advantages of: isotropy (avoiding the formation of weak planes); the possibility of using recycled plastic material; and expected compatibility with normal maintenance procedures. A series of full size tests has been conducted in the Southampton Railway Testing Facility (SRTF) to evaluate the resilient and plastic response of reinforced ballast to vertical cyclic loading. The testing apparatus represents a slice of single track extended to the shoulders and including one sleeper. A vertical load, representing a 20 tonne train axle, was applied by a hydraulic actuator with a frequency of 3Hz to 3 million cycles. Tests carried out thus far demonstrate the importance of selecting an appropriate fibre width as a function of the average particle size of the ballast to be reinforced. Appropriately selected fibres are shown to reduce ballast vertical permanent deformations by about 25%.

[1]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Maintaining absolute clearances in ballasted railway tracks using in situ three-dimensional polyurethane GeoComposites , 2012 .

[2]  N. Consoli,et al.  Experimental Evidences of the Effect of Fibres in Reinforcing a Sandy Gravel , 2012, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

[3]  William Powrie,et al.  Feasibility study of random fibre reinforced railway ballast , 2014 .

[4]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF BALLASTED TRACK , 1987 .

[5]  Peter Keith Woodward,et al.  Geocomposite technology: reducing railway maintenance , 2007 .

[6]  Nick Thom,et al.  A study into the use of crumb rubber in railway ballast , 2015 .

[7]  Ben Leshchinsky,et al.  Effects of Geocell Confinement on Strength and Deformation Behavior of Gravel , 2013 .

[8]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  The performance of rail track incorporating the effects of ballast breakage, confining pressure and geosynthetic reinforcement , 2009 .

[9]  G. Raymond Reinforced ballast behaviour subjected to repeated load , 2002 .

[10]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[11]  Nick Thom,et al.  Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast , 2007 .

[12]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Subballast Subjected to Cyclic Loading in Plane-Strain Condition , 2015 .

[13]  Gerald P Raymond,et al.  The effect of geogrid reinforcement on unbound aggregates , 2003 .

[14]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Stress-Strain Degradation Response of Railway Ballast Stabilized with Geosynthetics , 2013 .

[15]  Jingpei Li,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Sands Reinforced with Discrete Randomly Distributed Fiber , 2014, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

[16]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Reducing railway track settlement using three-dimensional polyurethane polymer reinforcement of the ballast , 2013 .

[17]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  AREMA Gradations Affecting Ballast Performance Using Discrete Element Modeling (DEM) Approach , 2009 .

[18]  D. Muir Wood,et al.  Fibre reinforced sands: from experiments to modelling and beyond , 2013 .

[19]  K. S. Heineck,et al.  Effect of Microreinforcement of Soils from Very Small to Large Shear Strains , 2005 .

[20]  Taufan Abadi Effect of sleeper and ballast interventions on rail track performance , 2015 .

[21]  R. Michalowski,et al.  Triaxial Compression of Sand Reinforced with Fibers , 2003 .

[22]  Roar Nålsund,et al.  Effect of Grading on Degradation of Crushed-Rock Railway Ballast and on Permanent Axial Deformation , 2010 .

[23]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Performance Improvement of Railway Ballast Using Geocells , 2012 .

[24]  William Powrie,et al.  Measuring the area and number of ballast particle contacts at sleeper/ballast and ballast/subgrade interfaces , 2015 .

[25]  Claus H. Göbel,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF A REINFORCING GEOGRID IN A RAILWAY SUBBASE UNDER DYNAMIC LOADS , 1994 .

[26]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  A full-scale laboratory investigation into railway track substructure performance and ballast reinforcement , 2011 .

[27]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Advanced Rail Geotechnology – Ballasted Track , 2011 .

[28]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Performance assessment of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast during cyclic loading , 2015 .