Optimization of Concentration and EM4 Augmentation for Improving Bio-Gas Productivity from Jatropha curcas Linn Capsule Husk

Most literature suggests that two-phase digestion is more efficient than single-phase. The series of two-phase digestion studies have been conducted from 2011 to 2013 at the research farm of PT Bumimas Ekapersada, West Java, Indonesia. This paper reports on a research on optimation of concentration and augmentation of EM-4 (effective microorganism-4), a local commercial decomposer, as efforts to stabilize a biogas technology which made from husk capsules of Jatropha curcas Linn (DH-JcL). The studies of increasing organic loading rate (OLR) for the two-phase digestion was conducted to improve efficiency.  The concentration variable studied was 1: 8 (1 part DH-JCL and 8 parts water), compared to 1: 12 as a control. The augmentation treatment is the addition of EM-4 by 5% (v/v). It was also examined the augmentation of F2-EM4 (150 times duplication of EM-4) due to cost consideration. The studies were conducted in the laboratory which using a liter and two liters of glass digester and glass wool as immobilized growth. The results of this study support the previous studies: the optimum concentration was 1: 8, EM-4 was able to increase biogas production in two-phase digestion, yet biogas production decrease at single-phase. F2-EM4’s ability to support production of biogas were equivalent to that of EM-4.

[1]  Salafudin,et al.  BIO-REFINERY STUDY IN THE CRUDE JATROPHA OIL PROCESS: CO-DIGESTION SLUDGE OF CRUDE JATROPHA OIL AND CAPSULE HUSK JATROPHA CURCAS LINN AS BIOGAS FEEDSTOCKS , 2013 .

[2]  Salafudin,et al.  The modification for increasing productivity at hydrolysis reactor with Jatropha Curcas linn capsule husk as bio- methane feedstocks at two stage digestion , 2013 .

[3]  Leopold Oscar Nelwan,et al.  The study of two stages anaerobic digestion application and suitable bio-film as an effort to improve bio-gas productivity from Jatropha Curcas Linn capsule husk , 2013 .

[4]  B. Budiyono,et al.  Biogas Production From Cassava Starch Effluent Using Microalgae As Biostabilisator , 2011 .

[5]  B. Velmurugan,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Wastes for Biogas Production in a Fed-Batch Reactor , 2011 .

[6]  Cheng Fang,et al.  Biogas production from food-processing industrial wastes by anaerobic digestion , 2010 .

[7]  D. Herawati,et al.  Pengaruh Pretreatment Jerami Padi pada Produksi Biogas dari Jerami Padi dan Sampah Sayur Sawi Hijau Secara Batch , 2010 .

[8]  Edem Cudjoe Bensah,et al.  Improving sanitation in Ghana-role of sanitary biogas plants. , 2010 .

[9]  Alastair J Ward,et al.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[10]  S. Soni,et al.  Microbes: a source of energy for 21st century. , 2007 .

[11]  Wen-rong Hu,et al.  Biodegradation mechanisms and kinetics of azo dye 4BS by a microbial consortium. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[12]  Renita Manurung Proses Anaerobik Sebagai Alternatif Untuk Mengolah Limbah Sawit , 2004 .

[13]  M. Gerardi The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters , 2003 .

[14]  M. Drtil,et al.  Two-Step Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Treatment of Sugar Beet Pulp , 2001 .

[15]  A. Stams,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion. , 2019, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.