Effects of electrode geometry and cell location on single-cell impedance measurement.

Measurements on single cells provide more accurate and in-depth information about electrical properties than those on pathological tissues. The relationship between electrode geometry and the location of a cell on microfluidic devices greatly affects the accuracy of single-cell impedance measurement. Accordingly, this study presents numerical solutions from the FEM simulation of the COMSOL multiphysics package and experimental measurements to analyze the effects of electrode geometry and cell location on microfluidic devices. An equivalent electrical circuit model is developed to obtain the impedance and sensitivity of various cell locations on various electrode geometries using FEM simulation. According to the simulation results, the parallel electrodes have the largest sensing area (39 microm(2)) and the highest sensitivity (0.976) at a voltage of 0.1 V and a frequency of 100 kHz. Increasing the width of electrodes provides a large sensing area but reduces sensitivity, whereas decreasing the gap between electrodes increases both sensing area and sensitivity. In experiments, the results demonstrate that the magnitude is inversely proportional to the overlap area of the cell and electrodes. Moreover, the impedance of single HeLa cells measured at various cell locations can be modified using equations determined from the modeling and experimental results.

[1]  Sungbo Cho,et al.  Micro hole-based cell chip with impedance spectroscopy. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[2]  Lei Wang,et al.  Analysis of the sensitivity and frequency characteristics of coplanar electrical cell-substrate impedance sensors. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  E. Bruyneel,et al.  Cell size and mutual cell adhesion , 1976, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[4]  Urban Seger,et al.  Dielectric spectroscopy in a micromachined flow cytometer: theoretical and practical considerations. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[5]  H. Fujita,et al.  Integrated 3-D Silicon Electrodes for Electrochemical Sensing in Microfluidic Environments: Application to Single-Cell Characterization , 2008, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[6]  T. Chung,et al.  Continuous low-voltage dc electroporation on a microfluidic chip with polyelectrolytic salt bridges. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Ciprian Iliescu,et al.  Glass-based microfluidic device fabricated by parylene wafer-to-wafer bonding for impedance spectroscopy , 2007 .

[8]  Li Zhang,et al.  Patterning of HeLa cells on a microfabricated Au-coated ITO substrate. , 2009, Langmuir.

[9]  H Morgan,et al.  Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs. , 2007, IET nanobiotechnology.

[10]  T. Geng,et al.  Microfluidic Biochip for Impedance Spectroscopy of Biological Species , 2001 .

[11]  V. Freger,et al.  Highly conductive ordered heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes , 2004 .

[12]  C. Davis,et al.  Impedance spectroscopy of human erythrocytes: system calibration, and nonlinear modeling , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Ling-Sheng Jang,et al.  Microfluidic device for cell capture and impedance measurement , 2007, Biomedical microdevices.

[14]  Shekhar Bhansali,et al.  Design rule for optimization of microelectrodes used in electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[15]  H Stein,et al.  Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. , 1984, Journal of immunology.

[16]  S. Gawad,et al.  Single cell dielectric spectroscopy , 2007 .