The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response

Interindividual variability in response to environmental stimuli is believed to have a major impact on collective behaviors in social insects. The present study presents a detailed investigation of the variability in individual fanning behavior underlying the collective control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies. Four colonies were repeatedly exposed to increasing temperature and CO2 levels. The response threshold of each worker (defined as the mean stimulus intensity at which a worker responded by fanning) was determined. Temperature response thresholds of 118 workers and CO2 response thresholds of 88 workers were analyzed. Workers differed in their response thresholds. Some consistently responded to low stimulus intensities, others consistently responded to high stimulus intensities. No consistent correlation between temperature and CO2 thresholds was found within individuals. Response thresholds of fanning bees decreased over successive trials, providing empirical support for the idea of specialization through individual threshold reinforcement. In addition to variability in individual response thresholds, workers of a colony differed in two other parameters of responsiveness: response probability (the probability of responding to a stimulus once it exceeded an individual’s response threshold) and response duration (the persistency with which fanning was performed once an individual responded). The results of the present study suggest that response threshold, response probability and response duration are important independent parameters of individual responsiveness in the collective control of nest climate in bumblebee colonies. Key words: division of labor, nest climate, reinforcement, response thresholds, selforganization. [Behav Ecol 15:120–128 (2004)]

[1]  Sean O'Donnell,et al.  Thresholds of Response in Nest Thermoregulation by Worker Bumble Bees, Bombus bifarius nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2001 .

[2]  A. Himmer Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Wärmehaushalts im Nestbau sozialer Hautflügler , 1927, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[3]  G. Robinson Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labor based on hormonall regulated response thresholds , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Caste and ecology in the social insects , 1979 .

[5]  G. Robinson,et al.  Hormonal and Genetic Control of Behavioral Integration in Honey Bee Colonies , 1989, Science.

[6]  R. Jeanne Group size, productivity, and information flow in social wasps , 1999 .

[7]  R. Jeanne,et al.  The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (A study of temporal polyethism: Experimental) , 1993 .

[9]  T. Pankiw,et al.  Response thresholds to sucrose predict foraging division of labor in honeybees , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[11]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  John B. Free,et al.  Bumblebee economics , 1979, Nature.

[13]  F. D. Vogt Thermoregulation in Bumblebee Colonies. I. Thermoregulatory versus Brood-Maintenance Behaviors during Acute Changes in Ambient Temperature , 1986, Physiological Zoology.

[14]  Anja Weidenmüller,et al.  From individual behavior to collective structure Pollen collection and nest climate control in social bees , 2001 .

[15]  T. Pankiw,et al.  The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  T. Seeley Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their colonies , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. , 1999 .

[18]  Sandra D. Mitchell,et al.  Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor , 1998 .

[19]  J. Pasteels,et al.  Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant,Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae) , 1991, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[20]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  J. Erber,et al.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species , 1976, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  Robert E. Page,et al.  The emergence of division of labour in forced associations of normally solitary ant queens , 1999 .

[24]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Between-caste aversion as a basis for division of labor in the ant Pheidole pubiventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  F. D. The Social Insects: their Origin and Evolution , 1928, Nature.

[26]  T. Seeley The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies , 1995 .

[27]  Christoph Kleineidam,et al.  Collective control of nest climate parameters in bumblebee colonies , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  P. Frumhoff,et al.  A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies , 1988, Nature.

[29]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies , 1988, Nature.

[30]  P. Kirk Visscher,et al.  Lifetime learning by foraging honey bees , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  Jay E. Mittenthal,et al.  Response thresholds and division of labor in insect colonies. , 1999 .

[33]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[34]  E. Wilson The relation between caste ratios and division of labor in the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  Edward E. Southwick,et al.  Social control of air ventilation in colonies of honey bees, Apis mellifera , 1987 .

[36]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Doing the right thing: Ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  J. Pasteels,et al.  Caste polyethism and collective defense in the ant, Pbeidole pallidula: the outcome of quantitative differences in recruitment , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[39]  N. Calderone,et al.  Evolutionary Genetics of Division of Labor in Colonies of the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Response Threshold Reinforcement and Division of Labor in Insect Societies , 1998 .

[41]  J. Free The division of labour within bumblebee Colonies , 1955, Insectes Sociaux.