Challenges for Regional Innovation Policies in CEE Countries: Spatial Concentration and Foreign Control of US Patenting

Using techniques of data collection and mapping as overlays to Google Maps – on the basis of patent information available online at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – we point at two major and interconnected challenges that policy-makers face in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) when combating the lagging innovation performance. First, we address the spatial concentration by using a distribution analysis at the city level. The results suggest that patenting is concentrated in post-socialist territories more than in western nations and regions. However, there is not a single outstanding hub in CEE when one compares USPTO patents normalized for the respective population sizes. Secondly, we argue that dominance of foreign control over USPTO patents is mostly embodied in international co-operations at the individual level, and only rarely spilled-over to MNE subsidiaries. In our opinion, catching-up of CEE in terms of patenting is unlikely, unless innovation policy measures focus on growing hubs and target both domestic inventors and international relations of companies.

[1]  Peter Franz STILL DIVIDED BY TRANSFORMATION? CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF THE GERMAN INNOVATION SYSTEM AND THE BARRIERS TO EXTENDING IT TO EAST GERMANY , 2010 .

[2]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[3]  R. Bonmati,et al.  Science, Technology, and Innovation in Europe , 1980 .

[4]  Balázs Lengyel,et al.  A külföldi érdekeltségű vállalkozások és az egyetemek kapcsolatai Győrött, Miskolcon és Szegeden , 2006 .

[5]  Farid Toubal,et al.  Spillovers from Multinationals to Heterogeneous Domestic Firms: Evidence from Hungary , 2009 .

[6]  Balázs Lengyel,et al.  Innovation Policy Challenges in Transition Countries: Foreign Business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary , 2009 .

[7]  J. Blažek,et al.  Regional Innovation Policies in the Czech Republic and the Case of Prague: An Emerging Role of a Regional Level? , 2007 .

[8]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data , 2001 .

[9]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data using Overlays to Google Maps , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Diverse Effects of FDI in Regional Innovation Systems: Synergy Measurement, Complexity Theory, and Entropy Statistics , 2013 .

[11]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Geographic concentration of innovative activities in Germany , 2009 .

[12]  Alasdair Reid,et al.  Innovation policy for knowledge –based economy in Central and Eastern Europe: driver of growth or new layer of bureaucracy? , 2006 .

[13]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys , 2011 .

[14]  Akira Goto,et al.  Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator , 2010 .

[15]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.

[16]  D. Sheskin Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[17]  George Petrakos,et al.  Patterns of Regional Inequality in Transition Economies , 2001 .

[18]  Attila Havas Does Innovation Policy Matter in a Transition Country? The Case of Hungary , 2002 .

[19]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[20]  U. Varblane,et al.  Can the National Innovation Systems of the New EU Member States Be Improved? , 2007 .

[21]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Technology policy, European Union enlargement, and economic, social and political sustainability , 2004 .

[22]  Annamária Inzelt,et al.  Private sector involvement in science and innovation policy-making in Hungary , 2008 .

[23]  A. Varga,et al.  Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity , 2014 .

[24]  Tarmo Kalvet,et al.  Catching up, forging ahead or falling behind? Central and Eastern European development in 1990–2005 , 2008 .

[25]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  Transnational Corporations andthe Internationalization of R & D , 2005 .

[26]  Maliha S. Nash,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 2001, Technometrics.

[27]  Va Arlington National Science Board. , 2010 .

[28]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Space vs. Networks in the Geography of Innovation: A European Analysis , 2006 .

[29]  A. Varga,et al.  Research productivity and the quality of interregional knowledge networks , 2013 .

[30]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC) , 2012, Scientometrics.

[31]  Tarantola Stefano,et al.  Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012 , 2012 .

[32]  Stefano Usai,et al.  Innovation Clusters in the European Regions , 2006 .

[33]  Balázs Lengyel,et al.  Creative Occupations and Regional Development in Hungary: Mobility of Talent in a One-centred Transition Economy , 2011 .

[34]  Margit Suurna,et al.  Europeanization of innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe , 2010 .

[35]  Attila Varga,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers, Agglomeration and Macroeconomic Growth: An Empirical Approach , 2004 .

[36]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Handbook of the Economics of Innovation , 2013 .

[37]  A. Inzelt,et al.  The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition , 2004 .

[38]  Zoltan J. Acs,et al.  Could the Irish Miracle be Repeated in Hungary? , 2007 .

[39]  Slavo Radosevic,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, Organizers and Alignments , 2002 .

[40]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: A methodological patent study of German districts , 2005 .

[41]  G. Enyedi,et al.  The transition of post-socialist cities , 1995, European Review.

[42]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Space Vs. Networks in the Geography of Innovation: A European Analysis , 2007 .

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[45]  Walter G. Park,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PATENT RIGHTS : A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY , 1997 .

[46]  Christian Helmers,et al.  The impact of joining the regional European Patent Convention system , 2012 .

[47]  S. Radosevic Science-industry links in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: conventional policy wisdom facing reality , 2011 .

[48]  Tony Dale,et al.  Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[49]  Alessandro Chessa,et al.  Is Europe Evolving Toward an Integrated Research Area? , 2013, Science.

[50]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .