Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance

Chief executives must allocate their scarce time for scanning efforts among relevant domains of their firms' external environment and their firms' internal circumstances. We argue that high‐performing CEOs vary their relative scanning emphases on different domains according to the level of dynamism they perceive in their external environments. The concepts of dominant logic and sector importance were used to develop predictions about which external domains and which internal domains should receive relatively more or less scanning emphasis in external environments that, overall, are more dynamic or more stable. A field survey of 105 single‐business manufacturing firms evaluated CEOs' scanning emphases and firm performance. Results indicated that, for dynamic external environments, relatively more CEO attention to the task sectors of the external environment and to innovation‐related internal functions was associated with high performance. In stable external environments, however, simultaneously increased scanning of the general sectors in the external environment and efficiency‐related internal functions produced higher performance. These relationships were strongest between relative scanning emphases among domains and sales growth. We discuss the implications of these results for researchers and practitioners. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[2]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[3]  L. Warlop,et al.  Benefit salience and consumers' selective attention to product features , 1997 .

[4]  J. Child Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[5]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  A Multi-Theoretic Model of Strategic Decision Making Processes , 1997 .

[6]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[7]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[8]  B. Boyd,et al.  Executive Scanning and Perceived Uncertainty: A Multidimensional Model , 1996 .

[9]  Andrew G. Kotulic,et al.  Rationality in Strategic Decision Processes, Environmental Dynamism and Firm Performance , 1995 .

[10]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Correlation and Regression: Principles and Applications for Industrial/Organizational Psychology and Management , 1995 .

[11]  K. Sutcliffe What Executives Notice: Accurate Perceptions in Top Management Teams , 1994 .

[12]  Stefan Wally,et al.  Personal and Structural Determinants of the Pace of Strategic Decision Making , 1994 .

[13]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Exploring strategic judgment: Methods for testing the assumptions of prescriptive contingency theories , 1994 .

[14]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  The Interface and Convergence of the Strategic Management and Organizational Environment Domains , 1994 .

[15]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research , 1994 .

[16]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[17]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[18]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Divergence between Archival and Perceptual Measures of the Environment: Causes and Consequences , 1993 .

[20]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Strategic Decision Processes: Critical Review and Future Directions , 1993 .

[21]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages Among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes , 1993 .

[22]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[23]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[24]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research , 1990 .

[25]  R. Darlington,et al.  Regression and Linear Models , 1990 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[27]  A. Bedeian,et al.  .05: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Distribution , 1989 .

[28]  David J. Miller,et al.  Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications , 1988 .

[29]  R. Daft,et al.  Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study , 1988 .

[30]  J. Pearce,et al.  Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance† , 1988 .

[31]  David Miller Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance , 1987 .

[32]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[33]  J. Loehlin Latent variable models , 1987 .

[34]  Frances J. Milliken Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[35]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[36]  David Miller,et al.  Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms , 1986 .

[37]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[38]  B. Chakravarthy Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[39]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  ICIS Paper: Personal Information Systems for Strategic Scanning in Turbulent Environments: Can the CEO Go On-Line? , 1985, MIS Q..

[40]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[41]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[42]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment , 1984 .

[43]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[44]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[45]  Kathryn Rudie Harrigan,et al.  Research Methodologies for Contingency Approaches to Business Strategy , 1983 .

[46]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[47]  C. B. Schoonhoven Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[48]  D. Hambrick SPECIALIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING ACTIVITIES AMONG UPPER LEVEL EXECUTIVES , 1981 .

[49]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration , 1980 .

[50]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[51]  D. Schendel,et al.  A Strategic Model of the U.S. Brewing Industry: 1952-1971 , 1978 .

[52]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1978 .

[53]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[54]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Strategy formulation : analytical concepts , 1978 .

[55]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[56]  H. Ansoff,et al.  Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals , 1975 .

[57]  John Seidler,et al.  On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis , 1974 .

[58]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[59]  J. L. Bower,et al.  Business policy: text and cases , 1973 .

[60]  R. Duncan Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[61]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[62]  K. Andrews The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[63]  F. Aguilar Scanning the business environment , 1967 .

[64]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[65]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[66]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[67]  W. Dill Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy , 1958 .