Influence of imaging quality on magnetic resonance-based pressure gradient measurements

In cardiovascular diagnostics, the knowledge of blood pressure is essential for the physician. Nowadays, blood pressures are usually obtained by catheter measurements or sphygmomanometric methods. These techniques suffer from different drawbacks in terms of invasiveness, observable vessels and the resolution of the pressure values, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a promising approach to establish a method for blood pressure measurements that is able to overcome these difficulties. Phase-contrast MRI is used to acquire velocity-encoded data. Fluid pressure gradients can be derived from the measured velocities using the Navier-Stokes equations. Unfortunately, this technique is known to suffer from a strong sensitivity to imaging quality. Especially the low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of phase contrast MRI data combined with the limited spatial and temporal resolution could severely reduce the reliability of computations. In this paper, we analyze computations of blood pressure gradients based on phase contrast MRI measurements of steady and pulsatile flow in a phantom. The influence of image quality of the velocity-encoded data as well as of different segmentation techniques is evaluated. In case of steady flow, the pressure gradient values computed via Navier-Stokes equations show good agreement with theoretical values if physical a-priori knowledge is incorporated. If a pulsatile aortic flow profile is applied, the computed pressure gradients generally match catheter measurements well. Nevertheless, an underestimation of pressure gradient peaks is observed. Different segmentation techniques influence the size of root mean squared errors between computation and measurement as well as their reduction by the use of higher SNRs.

[1]  M. Zamir,et al.  The Physics of Pulsatile Flow , 2000, Biological Physics Series.

[2]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  Flow-based segmentation of the large thoracic arteries in tridirectional phase-contrast MRI , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Determining cardiac velocity fields and intraventricular pressure distribution from a sequence of ultrafast CT cardiac images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Amir A. Amini,et al.  Fast computation of static flow pressure maps from phase-contrast MRI in axi-symmetric coordinates , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  T Ebbers,et al.  Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase contrast MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  Concepts for visualization of multidirectional phase-contrast MRI of the heart and large thoracic vessels. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[7]  D N Firmin,et al.  Computation of flow pressure fields from magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  A Herment,et al.  Velocity encoding versus acceleration encoding for pressure gradient estimation in MR haemodynamic studies. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  T Ebbers,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of time-varying three-dimensional relative pressure fields within the human heart. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  E Mousseaux,et al.  Estimation of pressure gradients in pulsatile flow from magnetic resonance acceleration measurements , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  D. Laidlaw,et al.  Three‐dimensional, time‐resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  H. Oertel Prandtl's essentials of fluid mechanics , 2004 .