Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task

Subjects were shown pairs of letter strings and had to decide as quickly as possible whether both strings were words. The word pairs included associates (e.g., cat-dog), words not normatively associated that had been rated by other subjects as semantically similar (e.g., nurse-wife), and unrelated control pairs (e.g., bread-stem). Both associates and semantically related pairs were responded to more quickly than were the corresponding control pairs. The magnitude of the facilitation for the associates appeared to be related more to the semantic similarity ratings than to measures of either direct or indirect associative strength. It was concluded that the encoding of a word can be facilitated by the prior processing of a semantically related word.

[1]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Discrete Free Association to Compound Verbal Stimuli , 1957 .

[2]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  A revised design for an understanding machine , 1962, Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguistics.

[3]  J. Fodor,et al.  The structure of a semantic theory , 1963 .

[4]  B. Underwood.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  Latency of verbal associations and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[7]  M. Knapp,et al.  Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  The determinants of mediated priming: Time interval, semantic and associative relationships , 1969 .

[9]  Samuel Fillenbaum,et al.  Words as feature complexes: False recognition of antonyms and synonyms. , 1969 .

[10]  Morris N. Eagle,et al.  Synonymity, antonymity, and association in false recognition responses , 1970 .

[11]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  T. Landauer,et al.  Category Size and Semantic Memory Retrieval. , 1972 .

[13]  Carol Conrad.  Cognitive Economy in Semantic Memory. , 1972 .

[14]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[15]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Encoding task and recognition memory: The importance of semantic encoding. , 1973 .

[16]  Erwin A. Esper.  Analogy and association in linguistics and psychology , 1973 .

[17]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[18]  Robert M. Yadrick,et al.  The Effects of Instructions on False Recognitions , 1975 .

[19]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[21]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[22]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .

[23]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[24]  Ira Fischler,et al.  Associative facilitation without expectancy in a lexical decision task. , 1977 .