Engaging Women in Computer Science and Engineering: Promising Practices for Promoting Gender Equity in Undergraduate Research Experiences

Building on research that identifies and addresses issues of women’s underrepresentation in computing, this article describes promising practices in undergraduate research experiences that promote women’s long-term interest in computer science and engineering. Specifically, this article explores whether and how REU programs include programmatic elements designed to promote gender equity and identifies specific mechanisms that are seen as effective in supporting women in REU programs and in encouraging them to persist in computer science and engineering fields. The findings are drawn from a comprehensive study that includes a national survey of REU programs, follow-up interviews with REU program directors from across the country, and an in-depth evaluation of one REU program over four years.

[1]  Donna J. Nelson,et al.  A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES , 2005 .

[2]  A KimKaren,et al.  Engaging Women in Computer Science and Engineering , 2011 .

[3]  Sarah Mehigan,et al.  The year in numbers , 2016, Nature Medicine.

[4]  Meghan Groome,et al.  Building a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Agenda. , 2007 .

[5]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[6]  Janice E. Cuny,et al.  Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering: results of a workshop organized by the computing research association , 2002, SGCS.

[7]  C. Kardash,et al.  Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors. , 2000 .

[8]  Spike Cramphorn.  Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking / Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious , 2006, Journal of Advertising Research.

[9]  William Aspray,et al.  RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF WOMEN GRADUATE STUDENTS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING , 2001 .

[10]  D. Lopatto.  Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[11]  Jerry Kang.  Trojan Horses of Race , 2004 .

[12]  Rafiq Dossani,et al.  The Offshoring of Engineering : Facts , Unknowns , and Potential Implications Committee on the Offshoring of Engineering , 2008 .

[13]  L. Hirshbein.  Are women residency supervisors obligated to nurture? , 2006, Medical education.

[14]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Homer A. Neal,et al.  Beyond Sputnik: U.S. Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century , 2008 .

[16]  Eric S. Roberts,et al.  Encouraging women in computer science , 2002, SGCS.

[17]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[18]  P. Gurin.  Women's Gender Consciousness , 1985 .

[19]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[20]  S. Spencer,et al.  Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat , 2002 .

[21]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[22]  Jo Sanders.  Gender and technology in education: what the research tells us , 2005, CWIT '05.

[23]  David Lopatto,et al.  The Essential Features of Undergraduate Research , 2003 .

[24]  E. Seymour,et al.  Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study , 2004 .

[25]  Ben A. Barres,et al.  Does gender matter? , 2006, Nature.

[26]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[27]  HAVING THE TALK: ENGAGING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN DISCUSSIONS ON GENDER AND INEQUITY , 2006 .

[28]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[29]  Jane L. Lehr,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2001 .

[30]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[31]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  Student and Faculty Perceptions of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Computing , 2009, TOCE.

[32]  Denise E. Agosto.  Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation , 2007 .

[33]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[34]  D. Allbritton,et al.  Traversing the Undergraduate Curriculum in Computer Science: Where Do Students Stumble? , 2006 .

[35]  William Aspray,et al.  Just Get Over It or Just Get On with It: Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing , 2008 .

[36]  J. Jesse.  The Poverty of the Pipeline Metaphor: The AAAS/CPST Study of Nontraditional Pathways into IT/CS Education and the Workforce , 2006 .

[37]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[38]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations , 2006 .

[39]  Catherine Hazzard,et al.  Women and information technology , 2001 .

[40]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[41]  E. Bonilla-Silva.  Racism without racists : color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States , 2006 .