Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations in general thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES To determine the grades of recommendations and levels of evidence available if the formal practice of evidence-based medicine is applied to general thoracic surgery. METHODS Three general thoracic surgeons, by consensus, developed a sample of 10 clinically important questions. The first 3 steps of evidence-based medicine (creation of answerable clinical questions, search for best external evidence, and critical appraisal of literature) were performed. Abstracts and appropriate articles were identified through Medline from January 1999 through December 2001. A hierarchical series of search strategies was employed to identify the best level of evidence. The best evidence found was categorized according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine into 4 grades of recommendations (A-D) and 5 levels of evidence (1-5). RESULTS The best evidence found for the 10 sample questions was categorized as grade A recommendations in 5 and grade B, also in 5 questions. The levels of evidence found were la in 3 studies, 1b in 5, and 2b in 2. CONCLUSIONS A formal evidence-based-medicine approach to general thoracic surgery found the grades of recommendation and levels of evidence for a sample of clinically important questions to be high.

[1]  D K Owens,et al.  Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  J. Padilla,et al.  Preresectional chemotherapy in stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a 7-year assessment of a randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Lung cancer.

[3]  P. Devitt,et al.  Prospective randomized double‐blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  K A McKibbon,et al.  Locating and Appraising Systematic Reviews , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  S. Tsugane,et al.  A randomized trial of surgery with and without chemotherapy for localized squamous carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  M. Parmar,et al.  Preoperative radiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis using individual patient data (Oesophageal Cancer Collaborative Group). , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  K. Esato,et al.  Systematic Lymph Node Dissection for Clinically Diagnosed Peripheral Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Less Than 2 cm in Diameter , 1998, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  K. Chu,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[9]  G. Maddern,et al.  Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: A prospective randomized trial , 1993, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  H. Groen,et al.  Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Izbicki,et al.  Effectiveness of radical systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[12]  J. Urschel,et al.  Is general thoracic surgical practice evidence based? , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  C. Stoddard,et al.  Comparison of Nissen total and Lind partial transabdominal fundoplication in the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux , 1992, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  J. Roth,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1998, Lung cancer.