Methodology for Conducting Scaled Sonic-Boom Flight Tests Using Unmanned Aircraft Systems

This paper explores how a scaled aircraft can be used tomodel a full-scale aircraft sonic boom. All scales from 5 to 100% are investigated. To create a scaled pressure profile that represents the full-size aircraft, the Mach number, static margin, angle of attack, and canard incidence angle are set equal to the full-size aircraft’s parameters. By setting these parameters, the scaled unmanned aircraft creates an F-function proportional to the square of the scaling ratio. To scale the acoustic advance, the propagation distance must be reduced. One way to accomplish this scaling is to fly at a lower altitude; however, to generate the proper wing loading, a pull-up maneuver must be performed. Alternatively, the subscale vehicle can be flown at the full-scale aircraft cruise altitude, and data are recorded at an intermediate altitude by a chase aircraft with a pressure probe. Using this method, the test aircraft properly models the shape of the full-scale aircraft sonic boom. The duration and overpressure of its sonic boom are respectively linearly and quadratically proportional to its scale. The lower bound in size is explored by considering manufacturing, data acquisition, and molecular relaxation.

[1]  Lawrence K. Loftin Quest for Performance: The Evolution of Modern Aircraft , 2012 .

[2]  James E. Murray,et al.  Airborne Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Pressure Measurements with Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparisons , 2005 .

[3]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Shape Optimization with F-Function Balancing for Reducing the Sonic Boom Initial Shock Pressure Rise , 2004 .

[4]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Lobe Balancing Design Method to Create Frozen Sonic Booms Using Aircraft Components , 2012 .

[5]  Kenji Yoshida,et al.  Supersonic drag reduction technology in the scaled supersonic experimental airplane project by JAXA , 2009 .

[6]  Peter G. Coen,et al.  Origins and Overview of the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Program , 2005 .

[7]  Damon Turner,et al.  A Multi-Disciplinary Survey of Advanced Subsonic Tactical Cruise Missile Configurations , 2005 .

[8]  J. J. Gottlieb,et al.  The overpressure signature from a supersonic projectile , 1987 .

[9]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Elements of gasdynamics , 1957 .

[10]  John M. Morgenstern,et al.  F-5 Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator's Persistence of Boom Shaping Reduction through Turbulence , 2005 .

[11]  Jongmin Kang,et al.  Nonlinear acoustic propagation of shock waves through the atmosphere with molecular relaxation , 1991 .

[12]  Donald Howe,et al.  Development of the Gulfstream Quiet Spike TM for Sonic Boom Minimization , 2008 .

[13]  W. D. Hayes Review of sonic boom theory , 1969 .

[14]  H. E. Kulsrud,et al.  SONIC BOOM PROPAGATION IN A STRATIFIED ATMOSPHERE, WITH COMPUTER PROGRAM. , 1969 .

[15]  John Billingsley,et al.  High precision GPS guidance of mobile robots , 2003 .

[16]  R. Seebass,et al.  Minimum Sonic Boom Shock Strengths and Overpressures , 1969, Nature.

[17]  Domenic J. Maglieri,et al.  Feasibility study on conducting overflight measurements of shaped sonic boom signatures using the Firebee BQM-34E RPV , 1993 .

[18]  Richard Raspet,et al.  Comparison of computer codes for the propagation of sonic boom waveforms through isothermal atmospheres , 1996 .

[19]  Donald C. Howe,et al.  Improved Sonic Boom Scaling Algorithm , 2006 .

[20]  Robbie Cowart,et al.  An Overview of the Gulfstream / NASA Quiet SpikeTM Flight Test Program , 2008 .

[21]  A. R. George,et al.  Lower Bounds for Sonic Booms in the Midfield , 1969 .

[22]  G. B. Whitham,et al.  On the propagation of weak shock waves , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A Shape Optimization Methodology with F-Function Lobe Balancing for Mitigating the Sonic Boom , 2002 .

[24]  Domenic J. Maglieri Compilation and Review of Supersonic Business Jet Studies from 1963 through 1995 , 2011 .

[25]  A. Sigalla,et al.  Effects of Atmosphere and Aircraft Motion on the Location and Intensity of a Sonic Boom , 1963 .

[26]  Robert Wolz,et al.  A Summary of Recent Supersonic Vehicle Studies at Gulfstream Aerospace , 2003 .

[27]  Xudong Zheng,et al.  Comparison of Full-Potential Propagation-Code Computations with the F-5E "Shaped Sonic Boom Experiment" Program , 2005 .

[28]  H. W. Carlson,et al.  A numerical method for calculating near-field sonic-boom pressure signatures , 1965 .

[29]  L. B. Jones Lower Bounds for Sonic Bangs in the Far Field , 1967 .

[30]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Shape Optimization Methodology for Reducing the Sonic Boom Initial Pressure Rise , 2007 .

[31]  R. Seebass,et al.  Sonic boom theory. , 1969 .

[32]  Mc Lean,et al.  Some nonasymptotic effects on the sonic boom of large airplanes , 1965 .

[33]  James E. Murray,et al.  Pushover Focus Booms from the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator , 2005 .

[34]  G. Whitham The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile , 1952 .

[35]  F. Walkden,et al.  The Shock Pattern of a Wing-Body Combination, Far from the Flight Path , 1958 .

[36]  Kenneth J Plotkin,et al.  State of the art of sonic boom modeling. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Richard Raspet,et al.  Modification of sonic boom wave forms during propagation from the source to the ground. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.