Structured Shared Spaces as a Basis for Building Business Process Support Systems: A Generic Model and Analysis of Examples

Though the concept of shared spaces had been known in Groupware and Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) for quite a while, it did not become popular until the arrival of the Internet and social software. Implicitly, the concept of shared spaces has penetrated many IT-areas, including the area of Business Process Management. Though shared spaces are used in many systems and tools, like Google Drive and Projectplace, there is a lack of research investigating this usage in a generic way. The article aims to fill this gap by introducing a generic model of a Business Process Support (BPS) system based on shared space that supports the comparison, analysis and design of BPS systems. In addition, the article goes in more details on one design issue – the structuring of shared spaces. This is done by analyzing and comparing two different BPS systems that exploit the concept of shared spaces, though implicitly. These systems use different approaches to shared space structuring. The first one organizes the information by grouping similar types of items without regard to the flow of activities in a business process, while the other organizes the information around groups of activities that are usually completed as a block. Which model to choose in a particular situation depends on the characteristics of the business process and its participants. In order to facilitate this choice, the article offers a number of guidelines derived from the experience of using the two BPS systems in practice. The article also discusses in what circumstances BPS systems with shared spaces are preferable to traditional workflow BPS systems.

[1]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[2]  P. Drucker,et al.  The Future of Management , 2008 .

[3]  Petia Wohed,et al.  Business Process Management with Social Software Systems - A New Paradigm for Work Organisation , 2008, Business Process Management Workshops.

[4]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Controlling business process instance flexibility via rules of planning , 2008, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..

[5]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[6]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Design Science in Action: Developing a Framework for Introducing IT Systems into Operational Practice , 2012, ICIS.

[7]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Ilia Bider,et al.  A Framework for Synchronizing Human Behavior, Processes and Support Systems Using a Socio-technical Approach , 2014, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[9]  Wil vanderAalst,et al.  Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems , 2004 .

[10]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[11]  Norbert Gronau,et al.  Management of Knowledge Intensive Business Processes , 2004, Business Process Management.

[12]  F. Kishino,et al.  Cooperative work environment using virtual workspace , 1992, CSCW '92.

[13]  Selmin Nurcan,et al.  Combining BPM and social software: contradiction or chance? , 2010, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[14]  Patricia Malone,et al.  Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done , 2011 .

[15]  W. Ashby,et al.  Every Good Regulator of a System Must Be a Model of That System , 1970 .

[16]  Helle Frisak Sem,et al.  How Can the Blackboard Metaphor Enrich Collaborative ACM Systems? , 2014, 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops and Demonstrations.

[17]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture , 2011, CAiSE.

[18]  Ilia Bider,et al.  In Search of the Holy Grail: Integrating Social Software with BPM Experience Report , 2010, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[19]  Uwe M. Borghoff,et al.  Computer-Supported Cooperative Work , 2000 .

[20]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work * , 1992 .

[22]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Achieving Workflow Flexibility through Taming the Chaos , 2000, OOIS.

[23]  Ilia Bider,et al.  State Flow as a Way of Analyzing Business Processes - Case Studies , 2002 .

[24]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Aligning people to business processes experience report , 2005, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[25]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[26]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Constructing Common Information Spaces , 1997, ECSCW.

[27]  E. Perjons,et al.  Chapter 4 Evaluating Adequacy of Business Process Modeling Approaches , 2015 .

[28]  Steven L. Alter.  Work System Theory: Overview of Core Concepts, Extensions, and Challenges for the Future , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Ilia Bider,et al.  A fractal enterprise model and its application for business development , 2017, Software & Systems Modeling.