Prioritizing the Effective Factors on Knowledge Commercialization Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study

Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to prioritize the effective factors on knowledge commercialization using fuzzy AHP at Isfahan University. Methodology: This research is an applied type of research that is conducted with mixed data collection method. The research community included 790 managers, executives, researchers and faculty members of the Isfahan University, and using stratified sampling 260 individuals were selected. The data collection tool is a questionnaire. Findings: Using fuzzy method, it was determined that among the triple factors, the contextual factors, and among the investigated sub-criteria, the commercialization culture sub-criteria, the knowledge base and research quality, and innovative infrastructure have the highest importance. In prioritizing the investigated indexes, the index of developing and promoting the commercialization culture and entrepreneurship, processing the results for different purposes, and focusing and considering the needs of market and customer are prioritized. Discussion and Conclusion: Due to the direct relation of the contextual factors with economics and politics, they have the most impact on knowledge commercialization at Isfahan University. Likewise, the content factors due to their relation with knowledge quality and human skills are considered in the second priority. Among the indexes, the index of developing and promotion of the commercialization culture, processing of results for different purposes, and also focusing and considering the needs of the market and the customer had the highest importance. Therefore, culturalization, the use of research results in different dimensions, and moving toward meeting the needs of diverse customers can help the process of knowledge commercialization Isfahan University.

[1]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge , 2006 .

[2]  H. Etzkowitz Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[3]  Amin Mozaffari Farogh,et al.  EVALUATION OF PROCEDURES AND METHODS OF UNIVERSITY RESEARCHES COMMERCIALIZATION; THE CASE OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY , 2011 .

[4]  Malhar N. Kumar Ethical Conflicts in Commercialization of University Research in the Post–Bayh–Dole Era , 2010 .

[5]  Weiping Wu,et al.  Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities , 2010 .

[6]  Morteza Mousakhani,et al.  Nationalized Model For Commercialization, Field Study In Iran , 2011 .

[7]  Haiyang Zhang,et al.  What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting in China , 2010 .

[8]  Abbasi Esfanjani Hossein,et al.  IDENTIFY AND EXPLANATION THE FACTORS THAT AFFECTS IN COMMERCIALIZATION OF UNIVERSITY RESEARCH USING TRIANGULATION MODEL , 2014 .

[9]  A. Gholipour,et al.  REPRESENTATING BARRIERS TO ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND KNOWLEDGE COMMERCIALIZATION AT UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN , 2010 .

[10]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[11]  Keith M. Hmieleski,et al.  The Psychological Foundations of University Science Commercialization: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research , 2017 .

[12]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Introduction to the Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Pourezzat Ali Asghar,et al.  STUDYING AND SORTING THE CHALLENGES AND BARRIERS OF KNOWLEDGE COMMERCIALIZATION USING Q-METHODOLOGY , 2011 .