Expressions for IAU 2000 precession quantities

A new precession-nutation model for the Celestial Intermediate Pole (CIP) was adopted by the IAU in 2000 (Resolution B1.6). The model, designated IAU 2000A, includes a nutation series for a non-rigid Earth and corrections for the precession rates in longitude and obliquity. The model also specifies numerical values for the pole osets at J2000.0 between the mean equatorial frame and the Geocentric Celestial Reference System (GCRS). In this paper, we discuss precession models consistent with IAU 2000A precession-nutation (i.e. MHB 2000, provided by Mathews et al. 2002) and we provide a range of expressions that implement them. The final precession model, designated P03, is a possible replacement for the precession com- ponent of IAU 2000A, oering improved dynamical consistency and a better basis for future improvement. As a preliminary step, we present our expressions for the currently used precession quantities A;A; zA, in agreement with the MHB corrections to the precession rates, that appear in the IERS Conventions 2000. We then discuss a more sophisticated method for improving the precession model of the equator in order that it be compliant with the IAU 2000A model. In contrast to the first method, which is based on corrections to the t terms of the developments for the precession quantities in longitude and obliquity, this method also uses corrections to their higher degree terms. It is essential that this be used in conjunction with an improved model for the ecliptic precession, which is expected, given the known discrepancies in the IAU 1976 expressions, to contribute in a significant way to these higher degree terms. With this aim in view, we have developed new expressions for the motion of the ecliptic with respect to the fixed ecliptic using the developments from Simon et al. (1994) and Williams (1994) and with improved constants fitted to the most recent numerical planetary ephemerides. We have then used these new expressions for the ecliptic together with the MHB corrections to precession rates to solve the precession equations for providing new solution for the precession of the equator that is dynamically consistent and compliant with IAU 2000. A number of perturbing eects have first been removed from the MHB estimates in order to get the physical quantities needed in the equations as integration constants. The equations have then been solved in a similar way to Lieske et al. (1977) and Williams (1994), based on similar theoretical expressions for the contributions to precession rates, revised by using MHB values. Once improved expressions have been obtained for the precession of the ecliptic and the equator, we discuss the most suitable precession quantities to be considered in order to be based on the minimum number of variables and to be the best adapted to the most recent models and observations. Finally we provide developments for these quantities, denoted the P03 solution, including a revised Sidereal Time expression.

[1]  Thomas A. Herring,et al.  Modeling of nutation‐precession: Very long baseline interferometry results , 2002 .

[2]  V. Dehant,et al.  RDAN97: An Analytical Development of Rigid Earth Nutation Series Using the Torque Approach , 1998 .

[3]  Dennis D. McCarthy,et al.  Expressions to implement the IAU 2000 definition of UT1 , 2003 .

[4]  V. Dehant,et al.  On the precession constant: Values and constraints on the dynamical ellipticity; link with Oppolzer terms and tilt-over-mode , 1996 .

[5]  Nicole Capitaine,et al.  Expressions for the Celestial Intermediate Pole and Celestial Ephemeris Origin consistent with the IAU 2000A precession-nutation model , 2003 .

[6]  A. Fienga,et al.  Expressions for precession consistent with the IAU 2000A model: Considerations about the ecliptic and the Earth Orientation Parameters , 2003 .

[7]  H. Kinoshita Theory of the rotation of the rigid earth , 1977 .

[8]  J. Chapront,et al.  A new determination of lunar orbital parameters, precession constant and tidal acceleration from LLR measurements , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas A. Herring,et al.  Modeling of nutation and precession: New nutation series for nonrigid Earth and insights into the Ea , 2002 .

[10]  James G. Williams,et al.  Contributions to the Earth's Obliquity Rate, Precession, and Nutation , 1994 .

[11]  M. Soffel,et al.  The geophysical approach towards the nutation of a rigid Earth , 1999 .

[12]  John M. Wahr,et al.  The forced nutations of an elliptical, rotating, elastic and oceanless earth , 1981 .

[13]  J. Souchay,et al.  Corrections and new developments in rigid earth nutation theory. III. Final tables ``REN-2000 , 1999 .

[14]  Victor Brumberg,et al.  Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics , 1991 .

[15]  P. K. Seidelmann,et al.  1980 IAU Theory of Nutation: The final report of the IAU Working Group on Nutation , 1982 .

[16]  Basic Problems in the Kinematics of the Rotation of the Earth , 1979 .

[17]  Robert H. Becker,et al.  Probing the Ionization State of the Universe at z > 6 , 2003, astro-ph/0303476.

[18]  J. Lieske The evolution of adopted values for precession , 1985 .

[19]  James G. Williams Planetary-Induced Nutation of the Earth: Direct Terms , 1995 .

[20]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Spacecraft attitude determination and control , 1978 .