Context-dependent relationship between a composite measure of men’s mate value and ejaculate quality

Secondary sexual traits in males are recognized as having arisen in order to gain access to reproductive opportunities, through their effects on the outcome of male–male competition and female choice. The phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis proposes that ejaculate quality is honestly advertised via secondary sexual traits. Alternatively, if males have limited resources to allocate to both pre- and postcopulatory traits, males possessing attractive phenotypic or behavioral traits may produce poorer quality ejaculates. Sperm competition theory also predicts that the female phenotype will influence ejaculate quality, with males increasing investment as female attractiveness increases. However, the extent to which the male and female phenotypes interact in affecting ejaculate quality has not been widely studied. Here, we examine how male and female phenotypes influence ejaculate quality in humans. Eighty-one men, for whom we had a composite measure of overall male mate value, produced a semen sample in response to images of either highly attractive or less attractive women. We found a significant relationship between male mate value and ejaculate quality that was context dependent. Sperm motility and concentration increased with male mate value but only when men viewed images of highly attractive women. Context dependence may contribute, in part, to the often conflicting patterns of variation found in studies that test the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis.

[1]  M. Kisley,et al.  The effects of facial attractiveness and perceiver's mate value on adaptive allocation of central processing resources , 2014 .

[2]  E. Goldberg,et al.  Male contraception: another Holy Grail. , 2014, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[3]  T. Ariyomo,et al.  Disassortative mating for boldness decreases reproductive success in the guppy , 2013 .

[4]  A. Møller,et al.  Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta‐analysis , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  D. Feinberg,et al.  Men's Preferences for Women's Femininity in Dynamic Cross-Modal Stimuli , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  Ting Ji,et al.  Potentials-Attract or Likes-Attract in Human Mate Choice in China , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  L. Simmons,et al.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE–MALE COMPETITION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  K. Navara,et al.  Comb size and color relate to sperm quality: a test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis , 2012 .

[10]  R. Sacchi,et al.  Sperm Traits Negatively Covary with Size and Asymmetry of a Secondary Sexual Trait in a Freshwater Crayfish , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Judith A. Easton Individual differences in perceptions of the benefits and costs of short-term mating , 2012 .

[12]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Low Pitched Voices Are Perceived as Masculine and Attractive but Do They Predict Semen Quality in Men? , 2011, PloS one.

[13]  M. Jennions,et al.  Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta‐analyses of strategic ejaculation , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  C. Dunkel,et al.  The Effect of Individual Differences and Manipulated Life Expectancies on the Willingness to Engage in Sexual Coercion , 2011, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[15]  Javier delBarco-Trillo Adjustment of sperm allocation under high risk of sperm competition across taxa: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[16]  P. Mathur,et al.  The effect of environmental contaminants on testicular function. , 2011, Asian journal of andrology.

[17]  A. Pacey,et al.  Using erotica in government-funded health service clinics. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[18]  Brendan P. Zietsch,et al.  Variation in Human Mate Choice: Simultaneously Investigating Heritability, Parental Influence, Sexual Imprinting, and Assortative Mating , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[19]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Fecundity Selection and the Evolution of Reproductive Output and Sex-Specific Body Size in the Liolaemus Lizard Adaptive Radiation , 2011, Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  Y. S. D. Mitcheson,et al.  Male body size predicts sperm number in the mandarinfish , 2010 .

[21]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Plumage coloration, ejaculate quality and reproductive phenotype in the red-backed fairy-wren , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Bethan J. Morgan,et al.  Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women's attractiveness , 2010 .

[23]  David R. Wilson,et al.  Seizing the Opportunity: Subordinate Male Fowl Respond Rapidly to Variation in Social Context , 2009 .

[24]  L. Simmons,et al.  Male dominance influences pheromone expression, ejaculate quality, and fertilization success in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2009 .

[25]  A. Dixson Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems , 2009 .

[26]  C. Cornwallis,et al.  Sperm: seminal fluid interactions and the adjustment of sperm quality in relation to female attractiveness , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Associations between dietary patterns and semen quality in men undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[28]  T. Chapman,et al.  Seminal Fluid Protein Allocation and Male Reproductive Success , 2009, Current Biology.

[29]  D. Hanley,et al.  Secondary sexual characters and sperm traits in coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. , 2009, Journal of fish biology.

[30]  Anthony Cox,et al.  Components of self-perceived mate value. , 2008 .

[31]  T. Chapman,et al.  Male sexual ornament size is positively associated with reproductive morphology and enhanced fertility in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[32]  P. J. Moore,et al.  Sperm competition within a dominance hierarchy: investment in social status vs. investment in ejaculates , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[33]  J. Malm,et al.  Comparison of semen parameters in samples collected by masturbation at a clinic and at home. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[34]  D. Perrett,et al.  The Role of Femininity and Averageness of Voice Pitch in Aesthetic Judgments of Women's Voices , 2008, Perception.

[35]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality? , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[36]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Changes in Sperm Quality and Numbers in Response to Experimental Manipulation of Male Social Status and Female Attractiveness , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[37]  W. Guo,et al.  Identification of sperm forward motility‐related proteins in human seminal plasma , 2007, Molecular reproduction and development.

[38]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  T. Shackelford,et al.  Adaptation to Sperm Competition in Humans , 2007 .

[40]  E. Lamirande Semenogelin, the main protein of the human semen coagulum, regulates sperm function. , 2007 .

[41]  D. Perrett,et al.  Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits , 2006 .

[42]  L. Simmons,et al.  Image content influences men's semen quality , 2005, Biology Letters.

[43]  F. Giuliano,et al.  Physiology of ejaculation: emphasis on serotonergic control. , 2005, European urology.

[44]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success , 2005 .

[45]  D. Buss,et al.  Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory , 2005 .

[46]  D. Watson,et al.  Match makers and deal breakers: analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[47]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Human sperm competition: testis size, sperm production and rates of extrapair copulations , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  G. Jasienska,et al.  Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  J. Bundgaard,et al.  The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2004, Hereditas.

[50]  D. Geary,et al.  Evolution of human mate choice , 2004, Journal of sex research.

[51]  Devendra Singh,et al.  Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness , 2004, Journal of sex research.

[52]  Ashok Agarwal,et al.  New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. , 2003, Journal of andrology.

[53]  C. Soler,et al.  Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality , 2003 .

[54]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females , 2002 .

[55]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford,et al.  Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition , 2002 .

[57]  D. Roff,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF TRADE‐OFFS: TESTING PREDICTIONS ON RESPONSE TO SELECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  D. Waynforth Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men , 2001, Human nature.

[59]  Hiroaki Shibahara,et al.  ANDROLOGY: Relationships Between Sperm Motility Characteristics Assessed by the Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) and Fertilization Rates In Vitro , 2001, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[60]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males , 2000, Nature.

[61]  Y. Mio,et al.  Influence of sexual stimulation on sperm parameters in semen samples collected via masturbation from normozoospermic men or cryptozoospermic men participating in an assisted reproduction programme , 2000, Andrologia.

[62]  S. Budaev,et al.  Individual differences in parental care and behaviour profile in the convict cichlid: a correlation study , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  Toshiya Masumoto Size Assortative Mating and Reproductive Success of the Funnel-Web Spider, Agelena limbata (Araneae; Agelenidae) , 1999, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[64]  K. Grammer,et al.  The Body and Face of Woman: One Ornament that Signals Quality? , 1999 .

[65]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Sperm allocation in an uncertain world , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[66]  J A McNally,et al.  In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[67]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[68]  W. Eberhard Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice , 1996 .

[69]  B. Sheldon Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[70]  M. Bellis,et al.  Human sperm competition: ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  George Plimpton,et al.  Out of My League: The Classic Hilarious Account of an Amateur's Ordeal in Professional Baseball , 1993 .

[72]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual Selection , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[73]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[74]  D. Buss,et al.  From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates , 1988 .

[75]  H. F. Newman,et al.  Physical basis of emission, ejaculation, and orgasm in the male. , 1982, Urology.

[76]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[77]  L. Simmons,et al.  Human Sperm Competition: Playing a Defensive Strategy , 2014 .

[78]  S. Austin,et al.  The association of body mass index and externally perceived attractiveness across race/ethnicity, gender, and time. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[79]  B. Mautz,et al.  Sexual selection in animals , 2011 .

[80]  Organización Mundial de la Salud WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[81]  C. Tanrikut,et al.  Antidepressant-associated changes in semen parameters. , 2007, Urology.

[82]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[83]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Sexual Selection , 2005 .

[84]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .

[85]  A. E. Comarr Sexual function among patients with spinal cord injury. , 1970, Urologia internationalis.

[86]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement , 2006 .

[87]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology ''out of My League'': a Real-world Test of the Matching Hypothesis on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .