Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Coherence of Discourse

Our original paper (Grosz, Joshi, and Weinstein, 1983) on centering claimed that certain entities mentioned in an utterance were more central than others and that this property imposed constraints on a speaker's use of different types of referring expression. Centering was proposed as a model that accounted for this phenomenon. We argued that the compatibility of centering properties of an utterance with choice of referring expression affected the coherence of discourse. Subsequently, we expanded the ideas presented therein. We defined various centering constructs and proposed two centering rules in terms of these constructs. A draft manuscript describing this elaborated centering framework and presenting some initial theoretical claims has been in wide circulation since 1986. This draft (Grosz, Joshi, and Weinstein 1986, hereafter, GJW86) has led to a number of papers by others on this topic and has been extensively cited, but has never been published. We have been urged to publish the more detailed description of the centering framework and theory proposed in GJW86 so that an official version would be archivally available. The task of completing and revising this draft became more daunting as time passed and more and more papers appeared on centering. Many of these papers proposed extensions to or revisions of the theory and attempted to answer questions posed in GJW86. It has become ever more clear that it would be useful to have a "definitive" statement of the original motivations for centering, the basic definitions underlying the centering framework, and the original theoretical claims. This paper attempts to meet that need. To accomplish this goal, we have chosen to remove descriptions of many open research questions posed in GJW86 as well as solutions that were only partially developed. We have also greatly shortened the discussion of criteria for and constraints on a possible semantic theory as a foundation for this work. Comments University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science Technical Report No. MSCIS-94-40. This technical report is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/232 Centering: A Framework for ~ o d e l l i n ~ the Local Coherence of Discourse MS-CIS-94-40 LINC LAB 274 Barbara J. Grosz Aravind K. Joshi Scott Weinstein University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering and Applied Science Computer and Information Science Department Philadelphia, PA 191046389

[1]  Rebecca J. Passonneau,et al.  Some Facts about Centers, Indexicals, and Demonstratives , 1991, ACL.

[2]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Control of Inference: Role of Some Aspects of Discourse Structure-Centering , 1981, IJCAI.

[3]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues , 1979 .

[4]  Y. No A centering approach to the [CASE] [TOPIC] restriction in Korean , 1991 .

[5]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Evaluating Discourse Processing Algorithms , 1989, ACL.

[6]  Carl Pollard,et al.  A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.

[7]  Megumi Kameyama,et al.  A Property-Sharing Constraint in Centering , 1986, ACL.

[8]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[9]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[10]  L SidnerCandace,et al.  Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse , 1986 .

[11]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  Centering theory and the Italian pronominal system , 1990, COLING.

[12]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Centered Logic: The Role of Entity Centered Sentence Representation in Natural Language Inferencing , 1979, IJCAI.

[13]  Andrew Kehler,et al.  The Effect of Establishing Coherence in Ellipsis and Anaphora Resolution , 1993, ACL.

[14]  M. Walker,et al.  A bilateral approach to givenness : A hearer-status algorithm and a centering algorithm , 1996 .

[15]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Mixed Initiative in Dialogue: An Investigation into Discourse Segmentation , 1990, ACL.

[16]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[17]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse , 1979 .

[18]  Rachel Reichman,et al.  Getting computers to talk like you and me , 1985 .

[19]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  SPEAKER'S REFERENCE and SEMANTIC REFERENCE , 1977 .

[20]  P. Gordon,et al.  Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Keith S. Donnellan Reference and Definite Descriptions , 1966 .

[22]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Japanese Discourse and the Process of Centering , 1994, Comput. Linguistics.

[23]  Rebecca J. Passonneau,et al.  Getting and keeping the center of attention , 1993 .

[24]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Centering in Japanese Discourse , 1996, ACL.

[25]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure , 1992, ICSLP.

[26]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[27]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Accent and bound anaphora , 1991 .

[28]  P. French,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language , 1989 .

[29]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Providing a Unified Account of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse , 1983, ACL.

[30]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Megumi Kameyama,et al.  Zero anaphora: The case of Japanese , 1990 .

[32]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. , 1977 .