Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.

Talkers adjust their vocal effort to communicate at different distances, aiming to compensate for the sound propagation losses. The present paper studies the influence of four acoustically different rooms on the speech produced by 13 male talkers addressing a listener at four distances. Talkers raised their vocal intensity by between 1.3 and 2.2 dB per double distance to the listener and lowered it as a linear function of the quantity "room gain" at a rate of -3.6 dB/dB. There were also significant variations in the mean fundamental frequency, both across distance (3.8 Hz per double distance) and among environments (4.3 Hz), and in the long-term standard deviation of the fundamental frequency among rooms (4 Hz). In the most uncomfortable rooms to speak in, talkers prolonged the voiced segments of the speech they produced, either as a side-effect of increased vocal intensity or in order to compensate for a decrease in speech intelligibility.

[1]  Anders Löfqvist,et al.  Speaker's comfort in teaching environments: voice problems in Swedish teaching staff. , 2011, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[2]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Voice changes during work: subjective complaints and objective measurements for female primary and secondary schoolteachers. , 2002, Journal of Voice.

[3]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube,et al.  Experimental investigations of the influence of room acoustics on the teacher's voice , 2008 .

[5]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[6]  E. Vilkman Voice Problems at Work: A Challenge for Occupational Safety and Health Arrangement , 1999, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[7]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Hcrc Map Task Corpus , 1991 .

[8]  E C Healey,et al.  Effects of perceived listeners on speakers' vocal intensity. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[9]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Accurate vocal compensation for sound intensity loss with increasing distance in natural environments. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  G M Siegel,et al.  Auditory feedback in the regulation of voice. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Švec,et al.  Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Susan Thibeault,et al.  Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Magne Aldrin Generalized linear mixed models in R , 2013 .

[14]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures , 1999 .

[15]  M. Schroeder New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time , 1965 .

[16]  Julián Preciado-López,et al.  Epidemiological study of voice disorders among teaching professionals of La Rioja, Spain. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[17]  H. Traunmüller,et al.  Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  H. Lazarus Prediction of Verbal Communication is Noise— A review: Part 1 , 1986 .

[19]  G M Siegel,et al.  Effects of distance on vocal intensity. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  A Russell,et al.  Prevalence of voice problems in teachers. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[21]  J. Liénard,et al.  Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.