Papa Revisited: A Current Empirical Study of the Mason Framework

Nearly twenty years ago in MIS Quarterly, Richard Mason proposed that there were four key “issues of the information age.” This influential article and concepts have been used by many researchers as the basis for information technology ethics studies. This manuscript revisits the current state of information technology ethics by empirically measuring current attitudes toward these “four issues of the information age” as originally proposed by Mason: privacy, accessibility, property, and accuracy (commonly referred to as PAPA). More than 200 individuals are polled with regard to recognition of the specific information technology issues and their views on the importance of these issues as ethical topics. The four issues raised directly map to the four Mason PAPA issues. The study validates the PAPA issues and finds all the topics are currently viewed as important ethical issues. The study also finds that overall there are high levels of concern with all four issues but finds that privacy is viewed as most important followed by accessibility and accuracy which are viewed equally and property which is viewed lowest, but still very important. A demographic analysis reveals that gender plays a significant role in determining recognition of privacy and accuracy as important ethical issues. The implications of the study are discussed.

[1]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Individual Differences in the Acceptability of Unethical Information Technology Practices: The Case of Machiavellianism and Ethical Ideology , 2004 .

[2]  James R. Ciesla,et al.  Re-examining the Influence of Individual Values on Ethical Decision Making , 1997 .

[3]  T. Selwyn Ellis,et al.  The evaluation of IT ethical scenarios using a multidimensional scale , 2000, DATB.

[4]  N. Ben Fairweather,et al.  Being ethical in developing information systems: an issue of methodology or maturity in judgement? , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Karen D. Loch,et al.  Information technology and ethics: an exploratory factor analysis , 1994, ECA '94.

[6]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Ethics and information systems , 2002, Data Base.

[7]  James R. Rest Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory , 1986 .

[8]  Randy Ryker,et al.  Online Privacy Policies: An Assessment of the Fortune E-50 , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ranjan B. Kini,et al.  An Empirical Study of Software Piracy and Moral Intensity among University Students , 2000 .

[10]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  How men and women view ethics , 1998, CACM.

[11]  S. Athey,et al.  A comparison of experts' and high tech students' ethical beliefs in computer-related situations , 1993 .

[12]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Computer Aversion and Computer-Use Ethics in US and Asian Cultures , 1998 .

[13]  R. Mason Four ethical issues of the information age , 1986 .

[14]  S. Vitell,et al.  Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the Future , 2003 .