Perceptual localization of surface position.

In 2 experiments, observers were required to identify corresponding points on an object viewed from multiple orientations. On each trial, a surface was presented initially with a single target location marked by a small dot. Following a brief blank interval, the same surface was presented again at a different orientation. The observer was required to position an adjustable probe dot in this 2nd display to match the location of the target in the 1st view. Under optimal conditions, the variance in their settings over multiple trials was just a few minutes of arc, though these errors varied significantly with the structural complexity of the depicted surface.

[1]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual discrimination of local surface depth and orientation , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[3]  J T Todd,et al.  Perception of local three-dimensional shape. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[5]  L. Parsons Inability to Reason About an Object's Orientation Using an Axis and Angle of Rotation , 1995 .

[6]  Ken Perlin,et al.  [Computer Graphics]: Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism , 2022 .

[7]  J S Tittle,et al.  The visual perception of three-dimensional length. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S W Zucker,et al.  The Discriminability of Smooth Stereoscopic Surfaces , 1991, Perception.

[9]  S. McKee,et al.  The imprecision of stereopsis , 1990, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Todd,et al.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[12]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[13]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[14]  Darwyn R. Peachey,et al.  Solid texturing of complex surfaces , 1985, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Solid shape , 1990 .

[16]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Recognition by components: a theory of visual pattern recognition , 1986 .

[17]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Karen K. De Valois,et al.  Discrimination of relative spatial position , 1990, Vision Research.

[19]  J T Todd,et al.  The Visual Discrimination of Relative Surface Orientation , 1995, Perception.

[20]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Photometric Invariants Related to Solid Shape , 1980 .