Exploring the relationship between project integration and safety performance

While recent studies suggest that there is a relationship between indicators of project integration—such as early involvement of constructors—and the quality of project health and safety outcomes, there is no study that empirically investigates this relationship. To address this limitation in the current body of knowledge, the purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between several characteristics of the integrated projects and construction safety performance. To achieve this objective, the following activities were conducted. First, to collect detailed information regarding recently completed building projects, a survey questionnaire was developed in which, safety performance metrics—such as the number of accidents—were considered as dependent variables, and project organization, team integration, and using emerging processes and technologies were included in the questionnaire as independent variables. Second, the questionnaire was distributed to reach a diverse set of respondents, and a database of 204 building projects was created. The collected data was validated by conducting follow-up phone interviews with respondents. Finally, the database was analyzed using various statistical techniques to investigate the relationship between project integration indicators and safety performance. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence that early decisions of owners and contractors to move towards more integrated projects can impact the safety performance of projects.

[1]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Tool to design for construction worker safety , 1997 .

[2]  Yasser Mohamed,et al.  Early Contractor Involvement in Design and Its Impact on Construction Schedule Performance , 2009 .

[3]  John Gambatese,et al.  The trajectories of Prevention through Design in construction. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTNERED PROJECT PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[6]  Chan-Sik Park,et al.  A framework for construction safety management and visualization system , 2013 .

[7]  Mounir El Asmar,et al.  Improving Project Performance through Partnering and Emotional Intelligence , 2014 .

[8]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods , 2009 .

[9]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  PUBLIC-SECTOR DESIGN/BUILD EVOLUTION AND PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[10]  Markku Kiviniemi,et al.  BIM-based Site Layout and Safety Planning , 2009 .

[11]  Bryan W. Franz Modeling the role of team integration and group cohesion in construction project performance , 2014 .

[12]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  MODEL FOR PUBLIC SECTOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT SELECTION , 1998 .

[13]  Randall E. Schumacker,et al.  Learning Statistics Using R , 2014 .

[14]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Analysis of Construction Worker Fall Accidents , 2003 .

[15]  Dag Sander,et al.  Experience and Results From Implementing Lean Construction in a Large Danish Contracting Firm , 2003 .

[16]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  THE ROLE OF INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY ELEMENTS IN ADOPTION OF INTEGRAL INNOVATIONS , 2014 .

[17]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  The Toyota Production System , 1984 .

[18]  C. William Ibbs,et al.  Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Awad S. Hanna,et al.  Quantifying Performance for the Integrated Project Delivery System as Compared to Established Delivery Systems , 2013 .

[20]  Khaled Nassar,et al.  Developing a complexity measure for project schedules , 2006 .

[21]  Mark Konchar,et al.  Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems , 1998 .

[22]  Michael S. Puddicombe,et al.  The Contingencies of Project Management: A Factor Analytic Approach to Complexity and Novelty , 2011 .

[23]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  A Study on Lean Manufacturing Implementation in the Malaysian Electrical and Electronics Industry , 2009 .

[24]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Lean job design and musculoskeletal disorder risk: A two plant comparison , 2009 .

[25]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[26]  Richard L. Tucker,et al.  FORECASTING DESIGN-RELATED PROBLEMS - CASE STUDY , 1991 .

[27]  Michael S. Puddicombe,et al.  Why Contracts: Evidence , 2009 .

[28]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Attribute-Based Safety Risk Assessment. II: Predicting Safety Outcomes Using Generalized Linear Models , 2015 .

[29]  Laura H. Ikuma,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Lean Construction and Safety in the Industrialized Housing Industry , 2009 .

[30]  Ossama Salem,et al.  Lean Construction: From Theory to Implementation , 2006 .

[31]  Masayuki Tanabe,et al.  Safety design approach for onshore modularized LNG liquefaction plant , 2010 .

[32]  Sathy Rajendran,et al.  Building Information Modeling: Safety Benefits & Opportunities , 2011 .

[33]  Peter Raisbeck,et al.  Assessing integrated project delivery: A comparative analysis of ipd and alliance contracting procurement routes , 2010 .

[34]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Relative Productivity in the AEC Industries in the United States for On-Site and Off-Site Activities , 2008 .

[35]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Identifying Root Causes of Construction Injuries , 1998 .

[36]  Yang Miang Goh,et al.  Neural network analysis of construction safety management systems: a case study in Singapore , 2013 .

[37]  Ossi Pesämaa,et al.  Modelling procurement effects on cooperation , 2007 .

[38]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Exploring the role of team environment in building project performance , 2014 .