Evolution Characteristics during Initial Stage of Triggered Lightning Based on Directly Measured Current

The initiation of a leader is an important lightning discharge process, but how an upward positive leader (UPL) initiates is still not fully understood. The evolution characteristics of a UPL during its initial stage was systematically studied based on directly measured current data of 14 triggered lightning events in 2019. It was found that the initial stage of triggered lightning can be divided into two types: a single initial process form and a multiple initial process form, with percentages of 64.29% and 35.71%, respectively. Compared with the former, the latter usually lasts longer, and the corresponding lightning is often triggered under a lower ground-level quasi-static electric field. In each initial process, precursor current pulses (PCPs), PCP clusters and initial precursor current pulse (IPCPs) are typical current waveforms, and the pulse durations and transferred charges of PCPs increase linearly with time. However, in the multiple initial process form, the pulse durations and transferred charges of PCPs will reduce significantly after each previous initial process and then continue to increase in the following initial process. In each initial process, when the pulse duration and transferred charge of a PCP increase to a certain extent, PCP clusters and IPCPs begin to appear. For the emergence of PCP clusters, the average values of the threshold are 3.48 μs and 19.53 μC, respectively. For the occurrence of IPCPs, the corresponding values are 4.69 μs and 27.23 μC, respectively. The average values of pulse durations and transferred charges of IPCPs are larger than those of PCP clusters. Compared with adjacent PCP clusters, IPCPs contain more pulses, with a critical range of 6–7. IPCPs also last longer, and have a critical range of 138–198 μs.

[1]  Dong Zheng,et al.  Observations of the initial stage of a rocket‐and‐wire‐triggered lightning discharge , 2017 .

[2]  Hongbo Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of a rocket‐triggered lightning flash with large stroke number and the associated leader propagation , 2014 .

[3]  Dong Zheng,et al.  Experiments of artificially triggered lightning and its application in Conghua, Guangdong, China , 2014 .

[4]  Zeng Ron,et al.  Challenges and Achievement in Long Air Gap Discharge Research , 2014 .

[5]  Xiushu Qie,et al.  Propagating features of upward positive leaders in the initial stage of rocket-triggered lightning , 2013 .

[6]  He Hengxin,et al.  Research Progress of Long Air Gap Discharges , 2013 .

[7]  V. Rakov,et al.  Transient current pulses in rocket‐extended wires used to trigger lightning , 2012 .

[8]  M. Uman,et al.  Observations of the initial, upward‐propagating, positive leader steps in a rocket‐and‐wire triggered lightning discharge , 2011 .

[9]  Martin A. Uman,et al.  High‐speed video observations of rocket‐and‐wire initiated lightning , 2009 .

[10]  I. Gallimberti,et al.  Fundamental processes in long air gap discharges , 2002 .

[11]  Vernon Cooray,et al.  The Franklin lightning conductor: conditions necessary for the initiation of a connecting leader , 2001 .

[12]  J. C. Willett,et al.  An experimental study of positive leaders initiating rocket-triggered lightning , 1999 .

[13]  Vladimir A. Rakov,et al.  Leader properties determined with triggered lightning techniques , 1998 .

[14]  A. Bondiou-Clergerie,et al.  A simplified model for the simulation of positive-spark development in long air gaps , 1997 .

[15]  Hitoshi Sakurano,et al.  Experiment of Artificial Lightning Triggered with Rocket in winters of 1981 and 1982 , 1983 .