Script-based inferences: Effects of text and knowledge variables on recognition memory

Two experiments examined the tendency for subjects to falsely recognize script-based concepts after reading incomplete script-based texts. On an immediate recognition test, both the hypothesized position of a concept in the reader's preexperimental knowledge structure (central, peripheral) and the number of times the concept was implied in the text (0, 1, 3, or 5) affected the reader's judgments about whether the concept had been presented in the text. For central concepts, the number of text implications had no significant effect on either error rates or judgment times. For peripheral concepts, error rates and response times were dependent on the number of text implications. These findings were interpreted as evidence for selective activation of concepts within scripts.

[1]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  John B. Black,et al.  The representation of scripts in memory , 1985 .

[3]  L. Reder,et al.  Integrated knowledge in different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects , 1983 .

[4]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Integrating different types of information in text , 1980 .

[5]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Concepts, propositions, and schemata: what are the cognitive units? , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[7]  L. Reder.  The role of elaborations in memory for prose , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables , 1975 .

[9]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[10]  B. Hayes-Roth.  Evolution of Cognitive Structures and Processes. , 1977 .

[11]  J. R. Branfield.  Journal of Structural Learning , 1971 .

[12]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory , 1982 .

[13]  L. Manelis,et al.  Analysis of expository prose and its relation to learning , 1984 .

[14]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis , 1979 .

[15]  R. Abelson.  Psychological status of the script concept. , 1981 .

[16]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Memory for routines , 1982 .

[17]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. , 1980 .