Design for the BOP and TOP markets: Strategies used by the design students

The base (BOP) and the top (TOP) of the world income pyramid represent the poor people and the people from developed countries, respectively. About two-fifths of the world population can be categorized as poor. Poverty is a trap because children born to poor parents are likely to grow up to be poor adults. In recent years, a poverty reduction approach that combines business development with poverty alleviation has received attention. The design of products for the BOP is an important ingredient of this poverty reduction approach. While companies are beginning to address the product needs of the BOP, there is limited practical and theoretical knowledge to support them. The current understanding of the design for the BOP is limited. This study aims at exploring the differences between the design strategies used by the industrial design students in designing products for the BOP and TOP markets. The results indicate the differences between their design strategies (i.e. problem driven strategy, solution driven strategy) in designing products for the BOP and TOP markets. We have discussed the implications of the findings for design practice and education. In particular, we have discussed how university-based design projects for the BOP can help in developing students’ different design skills.

[1]  Yan Jin,et al.  Study of mental iteration in different design situations , 2006 .

[2]  Gerd Fricke,et al.  Successful approaches in dealing with differently precise design problems , 1999 .

[3]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams , 2011 .

[4]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  INFORMATION PROCESSING IN DESIGN: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[5]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study , 2005 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .

[7]  Aneel Karnani,et al.  Fighting Poverty Together: Rethinking Strategies for Business, Governments, and Civil Society to Reduce Poverty , 2011 .

[8]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[9]  T. Raj The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits , 2007 .

[10]  Cheryl Nakata,et al.  From the Special Issue Editor: Creating New Products and Services for and with the Base of the Pyramid , 2012 .

[11]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid , 2004 .

[12]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Identification and application of requirements and their impact on the design process: a protocol study , 2004 .

[13]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes , 2006 .

[14]  Santosh Jagtap,et al.  Design of Product Service Systems at the Base of The Pyramid , 2013 .