Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading

Abstract Geocell, one type of geosynthetics manufactured in the form of three-dimensional interconnected cells, can be used as a reinforcement to improve the behavior of base courses by providing lateral confinement to increase their stiffness and strength and reduce surface permanent-deformation. However, the use of geocells for base reinforcement is hindered by the existing gap between applications and theories. This study experimentally investigated the factors influencing the behavior (stiffness and bearing capacity) of single geocell-reinforced bases including shape, type, embedment, height of geocells, and quality of infill materials. Three of the four types of geocells investigated in this study were made of novel polymeric alloys using a new manufacturing technology. Repeatability and potential scale effects on test results were examined. The test results showed that the geocell placed in a circular shape had a higher stiffness and bearing capacity than that placed in an elliptical shape. The performance of the geocell-reinforced base depended on the elastic modulus of the geocell sheet. The unconfined geocell had a lower stiffness but a higher ultimate load capacity than the confined geocell. The benefit of the geocell was minimized when the infill material, quarry waste with apparent cohesion, was used as compared with the Kansas River sand without apparent cohesion. The single geocell-reinforced base had a lower stiffness and bearing capacity than the multiple geocell-reinforced base.

[1]  Jie Han,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Influence Factors for Single-Geocell-Reinforced Sand , 2009 .

[2]  G Jamnejad.  POLYMER GRID CELL REINFORCEMENT IN PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION , 1986 .

[3]  Jeb S. Tingle,et al.  Empirical Design Methods for Geosynthetic-Reinforced Low-Volume Roads , 2007 .

[4]  J Steward,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR USE OF FABRICS IN CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF LOW-VOLUME ROADS , 1977 .

[5]  J. Giroud,et al.  Geotextile-Reinforced Unpaved Road Design , 1981 .

[6]  Xuejun Wen,et al.  Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil , 2008 .

[7]  Jie Han,et al.  Design Method for Geogrid-Reinforced Unpaved Roads. I. Development of Design Method , 2004 .

[8]  Yuze Zhang,et al.  Development of a Performance-Based Laboratory Test Method for Evaluating Geosynthetic-Soil Confinement , 2008 .

[9]  Jie Han,et al.  Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Granular Bases under Static and Repeated Loads , 2009 .

[10]  T. B. Edil,et al.  Resilient modulus and plastic deformation of soil confined in a geocell , 2006 .

[11]  Jie Han,et al.  Numerical Analysis for Mechanisms of a Geocell-Reinforced Base Under a Vertical Load , 2008 .

[12]  Jie Han,et al.  DEM Study of a Shallow Foundation under Vertical Loading , 2009 .

[13]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells , 1999 .

[14]  Shufeng Pei,et al.  Investigation of the Bearing Capacity and Dynamic-Elastic Behavior of Mechanical Stabilization of Sandy Subgrade Using Geocells , 2007 .

[15]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  LARGE-SCALE MODEL TESTS OF GEOCOMPOSITE MATTRESSES OVER PEAT SUBGRADES , 1988 .

[16]  G. R. Carter,et al.  ORIENTED POLYMER GRID REINFORCEMENT , 1995 .

[17]  G. Madhavi Latha,et al.  Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand , 2007 .

[18]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Performance of different geosynthetic reinforcement materials in sand foundations , 2004 .

[19]  Xiaoming Yang,et al.  Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Sand under a Vertical Load , 2008 .

[20]  Jie Han,et al.  Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Geocell-Reinforced Bases , 2009 .

[21]  S. N. Moghaddas Tafreshi,et al.  Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement , 2010 .

[22]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Sand Reinforcement using Paper Grid Cells , 1979 .